Re: C++ 1.3.0 archive, XKMS

2006-09-11 Thread Martin Pirker
Hi list... Berin Lautenbach wrote: I've now tarred up the 1.3.0 code and placed in http://people.apache.org/~blautenb/ Took a quick look at this package. CHANGELOG offers: * Complete implementation of XKMS message set Yep, they seem all to be there. Looking at xclient.cpp, function doMsgC

Re: Support for XML Encryption

2006-09-11 Thread Sean Mullan
Jean-Luc Cooke wrote: http://xml.apache.org/security/Java/index.html Says: "Version 1.1 released on 7 April 2004. Includes a beta implementation of XML Encryption together with minor bug fixes for the XML Signature code." Does that mean 1.3 is also only Beta XML encryption support? No, I

VOTE: Apache xmlsec 1.4RC1 tonight?

2006-09-11 Thread Raul Benito
I think we have enough bug fixes to do a RC tonight, what do you think? [ ] +1 [ ] 0 [ ] -1 -- http://r-bg.com

RE: VOTE: Apache xmlsec 1.4RC1 tonight?

2006-09-11 Thread Hess Yvan
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raul Benito Sent: lundi, 11. septembre 2006 15:24 To: security-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: VOTE: Apache xmlsec 1.4RC1 tonight? I think we have enough bug fixes to do a RC tonight, what do you think? [x] +1

Re: VOTE: Apache xmlsec 1.4RC1 tonight?

2006-09-11 Thread Sean Mullan
I'm ok with that, and suggest 2 weeks for testing. --Sean Hess Yvan wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raul Benito Sent: lundi, 11. septembre 2006 15:24 To: security-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: VOTE: Apache xmlsec 1.4RC1 tonight?

Re: VOTE: Apache xmlsec 1.4RC1 tonight?

2006-09-11 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 On 9/11/06, Sean Mullan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm ok with that, and suggest 2 weeks for testing. --Sean Hess Yvan wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Raul Benito > Sent: lundi, 11. septembre 2006 15:24 > To: securit

Apache java xmlsec 1.4RC1 released

2006-09-11 Thread Raul Benito
I have just upload a new release candidate for the java library. You can find it here: http://people.apache.org/~raul/dist/xmlsec-1.4.RC1.jar The changelog are only bugfixes(see bugzilla for more info): New in 1.4RC1 Fixed bug 40290. Fixed bug 40298. Fixed bug 40360. Chang

Please let us know what you think about these potential incompatible API changes

2006-09-11 Thread Sean Mullan
Hi, Raul and I have discussed this a bit offline, but we decided to take the discussion to the list to hear from others about the effect of some potentially incompatible changes that were made to the TransformSpi class. In 1.4, a new abstract protected enginePerformTransform(XMLSignatureInput, T