DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40880] - Ability to override DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance in XMLCipher

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Cannot sign-verify twice in the same thread with different XMLSignature instances

Hi Raul, I was able to reproduce the issue. Please drop the attached interop.jks file to your classpath along with xml-sec and other pre-reqs and run the test case (TestSig.java). I ran this inside my IDE within the xml-security project. The exception stack trace is here : http://rafb.net/paste

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40880] - Ability to override DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance in XMLCipher

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40880] - Ability to override DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance in XMLCipher

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40880] - Ability to override DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance in XMLCipher

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

C++ 1.3.1-rc2

Hi all, For those that are interested - rc2 is in the directory, with the Solaris build issues rectified. Cheers, Berin

Re: C++ 1.3.1-RC1

Scott, I've done what you suggested with PLATFORM_OPTIONS, but I've removed PIC entirely (libtool takes care of that). In fact the problem with the -mt flag was the acx_pthreads macro (used as of 1.3.1 and taken from the autoconf-macros project). It's a really small bug with ordering of tes

RE: C++ 1.3.1-RC1

> In fact the problem with the -mt flag was the acx_pthreads macro (used > as of 1.3.1 and taken from the autoconf-macros project). I'm using a variant of it myself. > It's a really > small bug with ordering of tests of flags on the Solaris platform. > Because the Sun workshop compiler simpl

Re: C++ 1.3.1-rc2

Should have said what directory! http://people.apache.org/~blautenb Cheers, Berin Berin Lautenbach wrote: Hi all, For those that are interested - rc2 is in the directory, with the Solaris build issues rectified. Cheers, Berin

RE: C++ 1.3.1-rc2

> For those that are interested - rc2 is in the directory, with the > Solaris build issues rectified. RC2 builds clean on Solaris 2.8 (Sparc), OS X 10.4, and 64-bit Red Hat 4. Oh, and it *installs* clean on Solaris, finally (thank you!) -- Scott

Re: C++ 1.3.1-rc2

Scott Cantor wrote: Oh, and it *installs* clean on Solaris, finally (thank you!) . I'm glad - it was one of the main drivers for doing the conversion! Thanks for testing. Cheers, Berin