Re: Encryption does not replace elements' content

Thank you Sean Daniele Sean Mullan ha scritto: I believe you are affected by bug #42866: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42886 I will try to putback a fix for this soon. --Sean -- --- Daniele Gagliardi Engiweb Security - Gruppo Eng

Re: [Fwd: [VOTE] Put Apache Juice into dormant status]

I'll leave this another 24 hours, and then if nobody objects I'll +1 the vote to hibernate. If we want to resurrect the idea when someone has the bandwidth we can. Cheers, Berin Berin Lautenbach wrote: Note that this won't kill JuiCE, just hibernate it until such time as someone come

Re: [Fwd: [VOTE] Put Apache Juice into dormant status]

I agree thanks, dims On 7/18/07, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll leave this another 24 hours, and then if nobody objects I'll +1 the vote to hibernate. If we want to resurrect the idea when someone has the bandwidth we can. Cheers, Berin Berin Lautenbach wrote: > Not

Re: Problem with verfiying Signature

Make sure you implement the engineCanResolve method so that it returns true for the URIs that your ResourceResolver supports. Your implementation will not be used unless the engineCanResolve method returns true. --Sean Maximilian Hütter wrote: > Hi all, > > I hope somebody can help with this, as

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42886] - Error when removing encrypted content in 1.4.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu