Re: Apache XML Security compatibility between v1.4.3 and 1.3

2009-10-13 Thread Sean Mullan
Sasha wrote: I mean if I have a program that is written against Apache XML Security v1.3 will it continue to work if I relink it against Apache XML Security v1.4.3? I believe it should, but I can't make any guarantees. We didn't (intentionally) break compatibility going from 1.3 to 1.4. Let u

Re: Apache XML Security compatibility between v1.4.3 and 1.3

2009-10-13 Thread Sasha
Thanks for the follow up. Regards, Sasha.

Re: Info required on SAX implementation of XML Dgital Signature verification

2009-10-13 Thread Sean Mullan
It seems like the last time I worked on this, I didn't check in those new classes. Let me see if I can find an old workspace and I'll get back to you. --Sean pankaj.kha...@cognizant.com wrote: Hi all, We are trying to use the SAX implementation of the XML Digital Signature verification. The

Re: Info required on SAX implementation of XML Dgital Signature verification

2009-10-13 Thread Sean Mullan
The difference in memory usage should be noticeable in a streaming implementation, especially when validating large signatures. Also, the amount of memory used should be fairly constant as the size of the data increases. --Sean Sean Mullan wrote: It seems like the last time I worked on this,