Thanks. Can you also review the release note at
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201351?
> On Apr 8, 2018, at 11:38 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>
> I added myself as reviewer of the CSR.
>
> Xuelei
>
> On 4/7/2018 8:30 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> This is more natural.
I may use a title/subject that states the new state or behavior changes
of a RFE. For example, "Uses UTF-8 for KerberosString". Otherwise,
looks fine to me.
Xuelei
On 4/9/2018 7:58 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Thanks. Can you also review the release note at
Never mind, the latest webrev is great!
On 4/9/2018 9:03 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi,
I've seen a variety of interpretations of non-standard input for
parsing booleans and
it is likely to cause confusion across properties.
I'd prefer that we converge on the interpretation used in the
Hi,
I've seen a variety of interpretations of non-standard input for parsing
booleans and
it is likely to cause confusion across properties.
I'd prefer that we converge on the interpretation used in the
Boolean.parseBoolean.
Which uses: "true".equalsIgnoreCase(s);
Better yet, call