Re: [Selenium-devel] more explicit construction of registries for pattern-matchers, locators, option-specifiers, etc

2005-07-10 Thread Darrell DeBoer
On 7/11/05, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Darrell DeBoer wrote: > > > > > I think you're right - this mechanism is a bit clearer for cases > > > where we don't need subclasses to override behaviour. I'm not so > >

Re: [Selenium-devel] more explicit construction of registries for pattern-matchers, locators, option-specifiers, etc

2005-07-03 Thread Darrell DeBoer
On 7/1/05, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I introduced the PatternMatcher stuff recently, I used the same > kind of "reflection" trick we use for locators, commands, etc; > PatternMatcher tried to map a prefix like "regexp" to a function-name > like "RegexpMatchStrategy". > > I re