David Kemp wrote:
Are you also suggesting that we copy their code for
Class.create() and Object.extend() ?
Class.create(), anyway. And I like the more structured class-definition
style, e.g.
MyClass.prototype = {
method1: function(arg1, arg2) { ... },
method2: function() { ... }
}
Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 01/07/2005 09:03:49 PM:
> I have little idea of what best practice is in the _javascript_ world,
but
> I wonder if we could clean up the core _javascript_ code a little, perhaps
> even introduce some coding standards, etc.
>
> I've been perusing "Pro
On 7/1/05, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have little idea of what best practice is in the _javascript_ world, butI wonder if we could clean up the core _javascript_ code a little, perhapseven introduce some coding standards, etc.I've been perusing "Prototype" - a _javascript_ library t
I have little idea of what best practice is in the JavaScript world, but
I wonder if we could clean up the core JavaScript code a little, perhaps
even introduce some coding standards, etc.
I've been perusing "Prototype" - a JavaScript library that supports much
AJAX goodness, and really like w
