On Thu, September 29, 2005 11:46, Jason R Huggins said:
>> pending anyone more familiar with that code getting involved.
> That would be me... Sure. I'll take care of applying the patch.
Fantastic - thanks Jason. Welcome back!
--
cheers, Mike
___
S
Mike Williams wrote on 09/28/2005 08:36:46 PM:
> The code you changed was in the "twisted" server, was it?
It's disturbing
> that you had to mirror all the command changes/additions in the Python
> code - we should probably look at making that proxying code more dynamic.
>
> If you want to put a
On Thu, September 29, 2005 6:25, Warren Pollans said:
> I converted the the TestRunner tests that were included in the
> yesterday's svn version of selenium to run as ruby-driven tests.
Thanks Warren - this is great.
I must admit I'm completely ignorant of the "driven" stuff, and
unfortunately t
Warren Pollans wrote on 09/28/2005 03:25:36 PM:
> I converted the the TestRunner tests that were included in the
> yesterday's svn version of selenium to run as ruby-driven tests. Too
> much free time, I guess :-) They all worked OK after I added
about a
> dozen or so commands to Interpreter.
I converted the the TestRunner tests that were included in the
yesterday's svn version of selenium to run as ruby-driven tests. Too
much free time, I guess :-) They all worked OK after I added about a
dozen or so commands to Interpreter.py and RPC2.rpy. If this is of any
interest, I'd be hap
