Re: [Selenium-devel] Strings trimming

2005-08-22 Thread Alexander Dvoretskiy
Mike Williams wrote: David Kemp wrote: we could leave the default behaviour as is, but support both "trim" and "untrimmed" for those wanting to be explicit about it. assertValue | foo | untrimmed:tolower:regexp:^fo*$ I'd been thinking that stacked prefixes would be similar to nested funct

[Selenium-devel] more characters for locators identifiers ?

2005-08-22 Thread Alexandre Garel
Hello, I use custom in my selenium tests. I was surprised that whereas it is permitted to use whatever (javascript permitted) character with whatever case in custom function names ([A-Z].+ in selenium-browserbot.js, line 376), selenium runner only permits you to use [a-z] low cases. I don't u

Re: [Selenium-devel] more characters for locators identifiers ?

2005-08-22 Thread Alexandre Garel
Excuse me for the last patch won't work for selenium wont recognize implicit locators anymore (which I don't use). It's better to limit character for locator type to [a-zA-Z_] so the new patch : Index: selenium-browserbot.js ===

[Selenium-devel] Request MD5 for Selenium 0.5.0 zip

2005-08-22 Thread Amanda Waltman
Hello, I am requesting an MD5 checksum for selenium-0.5.0.zip file from http://gforge.public.thoughtworks.org. Due to security requirements, I am required to obtain digital signatures on downloads before installation in-house. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. Thanks- Amanda -- Respectful

RE: [Selenium-devel] check/uncheck commands

2005-08-22 Thread Harman, Elaine
Apologies in advance for the long, dull novel. > This is not exactly a bug - more a limitation of the design. At the > moment, element locators are expected to return only a single element. > This works nicely for most cases, but as you've found, it makes it > trickier to deal with groups of rad