[Selenium-users] I really really wish...

2005-11-06 Thread Russ Thomas
Firstly, Hello all, Just started playing with Selenium, and, just thought I'd mention a few things that struck me would be nice to have: 1 - Title of current test I think the titles used should be consistent between the suiteTable row and the current Test Table. To save me having to write thi

[Selenium-users] fireEvent in Firefox

2005-11-07 Thread Russ Thomas
I don't seem to be able to do this in FF fireEvent document.getElementById("divA") mouseover In IE it works fine. Even the following "bubbles up" fine in IE to the div (where the mouseover handler resides) fireEvent document.getElementById("divA").firstChild mouseover but nothing in FF. Poin

Re: [Selenium-users] Conditional checks

2005-11-14 Thread Russ Thomas
> Selenium developers don't want such optional statement in selenium   Why?  Am I missing something?  this isn't unit testing, it's functional testing...   Sorry, but this is hardly pragmatic - we need this.  If the Selenium developers want to empower us, I'm sure they could add it.  I, for

Looping test steps (was Re: [Selenium-users] help! help!)

2005-11-22 Thread Russ Thomas
From: Médoune Mbow Currently I will want to add one or any actins which will enable me to simulate the loop [for(i=0;i<7;i++)] as in java, c++, python If somebody has an idea on that which there does not exist. Or if that were already done I will even like how it is

[Selenium-users] spurious failures

2005-11-23 Thread Russ Thomas
Hi all, I'm starting to ramp up my tests/testsuite and have noticed some strange behaviours in Selenium. Basically, "Access Denied" is returned from some tests, while others return "Element x not found". Both of these appear "randomly" - for example, if I repeatedly run and rerun the same tes

goBack bug? (was Re: [Selenium-users] spurious failures)

2005-11-23 Thread Russ Thomas
fully "ready"... and why it's not working in goBack. [2] where "never" = thousands of sample runs in my dataset. - Original Message - From: "Russ Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 5:45 PM Subject: [Selenium-users]

Re: goBack bug? (was Re: [Selenium-users] spurious failures)

2005-11-24 Thread Russ Thomas
- Original Message - From: "Mike Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 10:49 AM Subject: Re: goBack bug? (was Re: [Selenium-users] spurious failures) There is a race-condition bug in page-reload detection on Firefox, which I haven't yet been able to get to

Re: Looping test steps (was Re: [Selenium-users] help! help!)

2005-11-27 Thread Russ Thomas
- Original Message - From: "Mike Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> All that said: if you can think of a way to do it purely client-side with JavaScript, that'd be fantastic! -- Hi Mike Well, yes and no... setTimeout (and in some ways setInterval) provide a poor mans version of threading

[Selenium-users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] in firefox

2005-12-21 Thread Russ Thomas
Why does this not work in firefox? eg assertAttribute [EMAIL PROTECTED] myClass works fine in IE, in FF I see Actual value 'null' did not match 'myClass' (I don't know why null is quoted - looks wrong to me). Anyway, how should attributes be tested in FF? Better, how to do attr tes

[Selenium-users] Verify.fail?

2005-12-21 Thread Russ Thomas
Hi all Thanks to Mike Williams I think it was, I know I can do Assert.fail(strMessage); in user-externsion.js. Question I have now is, how do I do the same with Verify? Yes, I realise this is an odd thing to want to do - commands should support assert* and verify* but in this one perculiar

Re: [Selenium-users] User-Extensions...

2005-12-22 Thread Russ Thomas
On 12/22/05, Mike Taber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, I'm wondering how others are using this ability to add extensions to > Selenium? > Are you not adding much if anything? Lots! > Are you just adding general utility type extensions? Mostly. I've added a few "app specific" things too - but

Re: [Selenium-users] How to open a "javascript:foo()"

2005-12-23 Thread Russ Thomas
I really don't understand what you're trying to achieve exactly, but myiframe.editEvent should get you closer, if editEvent is in the AUT. I'm not surprised your first method stops the tests - you've wiped the location. HTH Russ On 12/23/05, Mark Stosberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, >