Hi,
Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
I propose that every module which is required for a working system as
well as some modules that are extremely common be included in base.pp.
This sounds like it has some clear advantages. While I do think we
should allow the administrator
Le Tue, 14 Jan 2014 03:08:47 +1100,
Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au a écrit :
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:19:22 Laurent Bigonville wrote:
[...]
True. But seeing a list of 400+ modules isn't helpful either. Also
the module names aren't that informative, *I* had to read the source
of some of
The attached patch makes the changes to base modules which I previously
described work. It also has some other changes that were in the systemd patch
but which aren't part of the core systemd policy.
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog
On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:00:44 Laurent Bigonville wrote:
The one that aren't obviously for debian(anaconda,...) could indeed be
dropped. But there are some other that are a bit more on the edge that
should maybe stay. If you are not shipping them, we'll never receive any
bug reports for them.
