[DSE-Dev] Bug#569698: marked as done (/etc/init.d/selinux-basics should not umount -a)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:40:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#569698: fixed in selinux-basics 0.5.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #569698, regarding /etc/init.d/selinux-basics should not umount -a to be marked as done. This means

[DSE-Dev] Bug#727305: marked as done (selinux-basics: initscript fails in relabel_minimal())

Your message dated Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:40:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#727305: fixed in selinux-basics 0.5.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #727305, regarding selinux-basics: initscript fails in relabel_minimal() to be marked as done. This

[DSE-Dev] Bug#542907: marked as done (selinux-basics: Need more init.d script dependencies?)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:40:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#542907: fixed in selinux-basics 0.5.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #542907, regarding selinux-basics: Need more init.d script dependencies? to be marked as done. This

[DSE-Dev] Bug#796693: marked as done (selinux-basics: Has init script in runlevel S but no matching service file)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:40:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#796693: fixed in selinux-basics 0.5.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #796693, regarding selinux-basics: Has init script in runlevel S but no matching service file to be

[DSE-Dev] Bug#776205: selinux-basics: dbus uninstallable in lxc container due to selinux

On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:49:46 +0100 =?utf-8?B?RsOpbGl4?= Sipma wrote: Hi, > Woops... selinux is actually installed and enabled (permissive mode) on > the host The problem here is probably that the selinuxfs (under /sys/fs/selinux) is not mounted at all or mounted