On 13/01/17 19:56, Alan Jenkins wrote:
On 13/01/17 19:38, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 13:29 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/13/2017 10:27 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 09:48 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 23:42 +, Alan Jenkins wr
On 13/01/17 19:38, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 13:29 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/13/2017 10:27 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 09:48 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 23:42 +, Alan Jenkins wrote:
My main puzzle here[*] is why `fix
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 13:29 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> On 01/13/2017 10:27 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 09:48 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 23:42 +, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> > > >
> > > > My main puzzle here[*] is why `fixfile
On 01/13/2017 10:27 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 09:48 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 23:42 +, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>>> My main puzzle here[*] is why `fixfiles` handles sysfs (/sys/)
>>> fine,
>>> but
>>> then there's floods of warnings about debu
On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 20:47 +, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> Perhaps the root cause is actually the same. I still prefer the
> messages from fixfiles though. It explicitly detected conflicting
> labels on hardlinks
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411371
On this topic, I have opened
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 09:48 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 23:42 +, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> >
> > My main puzzle here[*] is why `fixfiles` handles sysfs (/sys/)
> > fine,
> > but
> > then there's floods of warnings about debugfs
> > (/sys/kernel/debug/). The
> > same se
On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 23:42 +, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> My main puzzle here[*] is why `fixfiles` handles sysfs (/sys/) fine,
> but
> then there's floods of warnings about debugfs
> (/sys/kernel/debug/). The
> same seems to happen with /dev/ being fine, but not the other
> virtual
> fs's with s
On 12/01/17 21:23, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 20:47 +, Alan Jenkins wrote:
On 12/01/17 20:01, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 12:41 +, Alan Jenkins wrote:
fixfiles links to restorecon. However if you start with
restorecon
"restore file(s) default SELinux
On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 20:47 +, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> On 12/01/17 20:01, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 12:41 +, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> > > fixfiles links to restorecon. However if you start with
> > > restorecon
> > > "restore file(s) default SELinux security contexts", yo
On 12/01/17 20:01, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 12:41 +, Alan Jenkins wrote:
fixfiles links to restorecon. However if you start with restorecon
"restore file(s) default SELinux security contexts", you can easily
miss the fixfiles script. fixfiles is more generally useful th
On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 12:41 +, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> fixfiles links to restorecon. However if you start with restorecon
> "restore file(s) default SELinux security contexts", you can easily
> miss the fixfiles script. fixfiles is more generally useful than
> `restorecon -R`. For example `re
11 matches
Mail list logo
