Hey all,
We are planning to release SMW 1.7.1 somewhere around the end of the month,
so in the week staring with the 27th. So far the changes primarily consist
out of bugfixes and some small feature additions [0] (so there ought to be
no incompatibilities or extra upgrade hassle). If this clashes
Hey,
> it doesn't seem important enough, in my opinion, to get a slot in the
Google Summer of Code
I tend to agree here. There are things in greater demand that would be
useful to more people that could be done. However, I think this idea should
go on the GSoC page regardless. If we get a very ca
Hi Stephan,
Well, I have no real objection to such an extension getting created -
whether or not anyone used it, it wouldn't affect the rest of the
software. However, it doesn't seem important enough, in my opinion, to
get a slot in the Google Summer of Code - especially since, whether we
go throu
Just a short reply: It would be good to have some such formalism, but
designing a good language is not easy and would introduce another
programming-like formalism into MW. I think one should seriously
consider the upcoming LUA support to solve this problem [1]. It would be
much preferable to ha
Hi,
for some time now I have thought on how it would be possible to get
away from introducing yet another new parameter every time a new type
of dynamic behavior is built into Semantic Forms. With the upcoming
GSoC 2012 I would like to discuss what I have come up with and if it
finds enough suppor
