Ok, digging this out again.
On 5 December 2012 22:39, James HK jamesin.hongkon...@gmail.com wrote:
# What would LTS mean in connection with SMW ?
Provide LTS versions of the Semantic Bundle.
This would mean:
* to branch off versions* of SMW
* to include updated versions of extensions in the
This all sounds very sensible Stephan.
Gives stability to those who need it and flexibility to those who want to run
more bleeding edge versions.
Cheers
Neill
Stephan Gambke s7ep...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, digging this out again.
On 5 December 2012 22:39, James HK jamesin.hongkon...@gmail.com
Hi Stephan,
There are a number of points to discuss here. In our case, I think
long-term support really refers to two things: support for older versions
of MediaWiki, and support for older versions of SMW. I don't know if
everyone's aware of it, but the WMF people have actually declared MediaWiki
Hi Yaron,
On 02/25/2013 07:24 PM, Yaron Koren wrote:
As to creating new Semantic Bundles on the fly that match some criteria
- i.e., using some set of Git tags - that gets complicated by the fact
that not all of the extensions have consistent tagging. Some (like, I'm
Yeah, that was one of the
Hi Mark,
It sounds like a good idea to me. What version of MediaWiki would you want
to start with - 1.20 (the current version), I assume? And where do you
think it makes sense to host and document these packages?
-Yaron
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Mark A. Hershberger
Hi Stephan,
Yes, I know that the the transfer to Git threw off a lot in terms of
consistent tagging - that's the main part of the reason why there have been
only two Semantic Bundle releases since the changeover happened a year ago.
In any case, anything you can do to improve the state of
On Mon 25 Feb 2013 02:12:41 PM EST, Yaron Koren wrote:
It sounds like a good idea to me. What version of MediaWiki would you
want to start with - 1.20 (the current version), I assume?
At the latest, we could do 1.21. Earliest I would go is 1.19. But
1.20 is a good place to start.
Since the
Hi - where can I find more information about how the MW installer
and the extensions it installs? And I'm also wondering what the criteria
are for an extension to be part of the SMW bundle?
thanks - john
On 25.02.2013 12:01, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
On Mon 25 Feb 2013
02:12:41 PM EST,
Hi,
Mark - that sounds like a good idea. We're actually going to have another
release of Semantic Bundle in the near future, that should fix some
remaining issues; so I think it would be a good candidate for trying to
create this kind of package.
John - the criteria for inclusion in the Semantic
Hey,
(because they had an extension accessing the DB directly).
Ignoring abstractions like this and making oneself dependent on private
internals of a system leads to fragility and rigidity. This is not good. I
strongly oppose doing effort to not break compatibility with such code as a
general
On 02/25/2013 10:27 PM, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
(because they had an extension accessing the DB directly).
Ignoring abstractions like this and making oneself dependent on private
internals of a system leads to fragility and rigidity. This is not good.
I strongly oppose doing effort to not
Hi,
SMW 1.9 (15/03/2013) - MW 1.19 (09/02/2012): 1.1 years
On a site note, in two or three occasions when I was adding something
to SMW 1.9 I had to back down because suddenly the approach preferred
didn't work in MW 1.19 (I think it is one hook, two methods when
testing against MW 1.19)
Hi,
Just to clarify: are you saying that the need to support older versions of
MediaWiki, and specifically 1.19, makes certain features in SMW impossible?
I'm not saying it is impossible but as soon as you start using if
statements to accommodate releases you introduce dependencies which
will
Hello folks, I have another exciting question
Programatically set special properties/meta properties are always
overwritten with a hard coded value or deleted by triggering
SMW_refreshData.php. There is a constant realtionship between semantic
properties and Wiki-text anotations. So only
Hello, I am trying to create semantic property just like that.
[[Teaser::some long text . ]]
But when I am doing the ask query like that
{{#ask: [[Teaser::+]]
| ?Teaser
}}
the result is empty, until I reduce the length of [[Teaser::]] content.
And when I reduce the length of the teaser
First of all ensure that the page Property:Teaser exists and contains the
following text:
[[has type::text]]
Then ensure that you have the latest version of SMW: only the latest
version can search on Text properties.
-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:55 AM, s9gf4ult
16 matches
Mail list logo
