Of course, I am THRILLED that this is coming down the pipe.
Sergey, If you're planning to do something crazy, I suggest checking
out DPL and RegExParserFunctions.
Combining {{#ask}} with {{#dpl}} and {{#regex}} can produce some very
neat combinations. Also, I'm interested to see what you come up
Although I am in favor of {{#ask:}} at the earliest possible
conveneince, after a cursory look through the code, I'm fairly certain
this extension will fail to operate as expected.
The first reason is that , which is an extension tag, will always
return fully qualified HTML. The output of a parse
> I guess another total hack is to name all the private properties similarly
> and therefore detectably - and then at render time, if the user is an
> admin, print those, and if the user is not, don't.
Assuming you had a way to programmatically determine whether the user
has privs to see the info,
What's funny about this (to me), is that I actually took the time to
develop such a parser function, created a patch and submitted it to
bugzilla[1].
Needless to say it was never incorporated because of a pending
"rewrite" of some core functionality. So I created an extension to do
this as well[2
answer any questions. Thanks!
-- Jim R. Wilson (jimbojw)
On 5/22/07, Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks cnit!
I'm glad someone else would find this useful. I'll be happy to integrate
my code into the SMW codebase and create a patch ... I would just like some
assurance fro
),
>> > because "friend of" is, in real life, always a bi-directional
>> > relationship. So let me substitute something that's more clearly
>> > one-directional for this example: how about "has been to the house
>> > of".
>> >
Thanks cnit!
I'm glad someone else would find this useful. I'll be happy to integrate my
code into the SMW codebase and create a patch ... I would just like some
assurance from a core dev that my patch has a chance of being applied before
I go through the work of making it.
-- Jim
On 5/22/07,
ibility of integrating this
functionality into the core. Thanks for taking the time to respond.
-- Jim R. Wilson (jimbojw)
On 5/18/07, Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm currently working on an InlineQuery Parser Function called {{#ask}}
So this: [[friend
Hi all,
I'm currently working on an InlineQuery Parser Function called {{#ask}}
So this: [[friend of::*]]
Becomes this: {{#ask:format=ul|[[friend of::*]]}}
I thought I was done, having basically written a wrapper around that
simply uses the Parser Function interface instead of an extension ta
Hi SMW Devs,
Quick question: is there a way to get a list of all articles that meet a
reflexive criteria?
For example, I've got a relation called "friend of", and I know how to do
these types of queries:
[[User:Whoever]][[friend of::*]] - This will return all articles
that User:Whoever is a "fr
Did anyone on the list receive this question? I thought it would be an easy
'yes' or 'no' - Thanks in advance.
-- Jim
On 5/14/07, Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there an equivalent to but as a parser function? Akin to
{{#ask}}?
Thanks in advance.
Is there an equivalent to but as a parser function? Akin to {{#ask}}?
Thanks in advance.
-- Jim R. Wilson (jimbojw)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express a
Probably a good idea to ban this account
On 5/7/07, Nannie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The cream of the crop for 2007 - GET IN EARLY! DSDI IS SET TO ROCK YOUR
PORTFOLIO!
DSI Direct Sales, Inc.
Symbol: DSDI
Price: $0.05
There is a MASSIVE PROMOTION underway this weekend! This is hot, read
the n
13 matches
Mail list logo
