Hey,
James wrote down a great list of advice. There is however one point I would
advice against following:
* Avoid turning protected/private into public methods unless it is
> necessary and instead use the ReflectionClass [a.10] for testing (SMW
> has as several tests that is following this schem
Many thanks for these recommendations James. Can (or have) you
document(ed) them on the wiki for ongoing refinement?
Cheers,
Dan.
On 10 May 2013 12:01, James HK wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I would like to suggest that unit/functional/integration tests would be the
>> best solution for this. I know it's n
Hi-hi-hi!
I've written a page about our first webinar!
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/1st_SMW_webinar_for_developers
Feel free to change the page, add your thoughts, interesting topics
and so on. And add yourself to the list of participants!
-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote
On Sun, May 12, 2013
Thanks James for your comments! Some of the links were really
interesting to read! Do you want to participate in the webinar as a
teacher?
-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:01 PM, James HK wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I would like to suggest that unit/functional/integration tests would
I am also think such webinars can be very useful for understanding SMW
architecture and make things a bit clearer for side developers.
I will be happy to assist Yury in writing down the meeting and creating
guides/howtos after.
09.05.2013 21:08, Yury Katkov пишет:
> (I've changed the subject n
Hi,
> I would like to suggest that unit/functional/integration tests would be the
> best solution for this. I know it's not easy to get into a testing culture,
> but various projects including parts of SMW are adopting this. It solves
> these problems:
This is certainly the right approach which a
Hi Dan! It's too early to plan the webinar date and time, IMHO. We have to
prepare the agenda first. I'm working on it.
-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Dan Bolser wrote:
> Thanks for organizing this Yury, can you set up a doodle to try to tie
> people to a date? A
Jeroen, I guess you'll be the one who teaches, right?
-
Yury Katkov, WikiVote
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Dan Bolser wrote:
> Thanks for organizing this Yury, can you set up a doodle to try to tie
> people to a date? Also, I guess we need to offer a box of chocolate to
> each develop
Thanks for organizing this Yury, can you set up a doodle to try to tie
people to a date? Also, I guess we need to offer a box of chocolate to
each developer who takes part! ;-)
Any confirmed?
Cheers,
Dan.
On 9 May 2013 18:08, Yury Katkov wrote:
> (I've changed the subject name. See previous e-
I would like to suggest that unit/functional/integration tests would be the
best solution for this. I know it's not easy to get into a testing culture,
but various projects including parts of SMW are adopting this. It solves
these problems:
1. provides clear examples of how to do things using SMW
(I've changed the subject name. See previous e-mails if you need a context.)
*PROBLEM*: Nobody understand how SMW works and how to inprove it, except
2-4 core developers. The documentation of the code is not sufficient for a
new deloper to quickly start participating in SMW development.
*GOAL*: El
11 matches
Mail list logo
