On Donnerstag, 20. August 2009, Daniel Friesen wrote:
> All these patch e-mails coming in is getting tiring. I'm getting emails
> that are pointless for me coming into gmane (and there's a bug at the
> moment that re-marks this list as unread when everything is read; so I
> end up back on the long
On Donnerstag, 20. August 2009, Temlakos wrote:
> That would definitely work for me.
>
> Now I always attach my patches; I don't include any of my patches
> in-line. Does your e-mail client render all attachments as in-line text?
> (I believe AOL had that problem a few years ago and maybe still doe
Yup, thunderbird renders attachments inline. It helps out when I don't
feel like bothering opening another application to view the file.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
Temlakos wrote:
> That would definitely work for me.
>
> Now I always attach my patches
That would definitely work for me.
Now I always attach my patches; I don't include any of my patches
in-line. Does your e-mail client render all attachments as in-line text?
(I believe AOL had that problem a few years ago and maybe still does.)
Memo to Markus: If you'd rather I didn't send patc
All these patch e-mails coming in is getting tiring. I'm getting emails
that are pointless for me coming into gmane (and there's a bug at the
moment that re-marks this list as unread when everything is read; so I
end up back on the long patch e-mail which bogs up my habit of using the
spacebar
