On Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2008, Markus Nitsche wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 11, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
>
>
>
> Firstly, to ask for a property that really has a "." in its name,
> use an initial space:
>
> {{#ask: [[ strange.name::Germany]] }}
>
> This example finds all things having
On Wednesday, June 11, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Firstly, to ask for a property that really has a "." in its name,
use an initial space:
{{#ask: [[ strange.name::Germany]] }}
This example finds all things having the value "Germany"
for "Property:strange.name".
OK, poll closed. Thanks to all who shared their thoughts on this. We
discussed, and I have now implemented the solution with ".". The SVN version
already supports this syntax. Here are some examples to explain the new
feature:
A query for people (or anything) born in a place that is located in
On Sonntag, 8. Juni 2008, Mov GP 0 wrote:
> Hi,
> from my subjective view the '.' is more easily to use and finer to
> read. But I support the technical standpoint that '->' will less
> likely result in the need for escape-techniques.
>
> Anyway, the escaping might get archived using '[[ ]]'. Examp
I'd like to cast my vote in favor of the dot (.) notation. I have some
experience with RLT and mixed RLT/LTR contexts and the dot would be
preferable.
-Robert
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Markus Krötzsch <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Freitag, 6. Juni 2008, Sergey Chernyshev wrote:
> > Can
On Freitag, 6. Juni 2008, Sergey Chernyshev wrote:
> Can I suggest to use '->' instead of dots - this will make it much less
> probable to have in Property names, but still reasonable as syntax.
I though about that one too, but I was not sure if it is preferred
internationally. Would the right-to
Can I suggest to use '->' instead of dots - this will make it much less
probable to have in Property names, but still reasonable as syntax.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:02 AM, Markus Krötzsch <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a proposal for a simplification in #ask query syntax that I
Markus Krötzsch пишет:
> On Freitag, 6. Juni 2008, CNIT wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>> I have a proposal for a simplification in #ask query syntax that I would
>>> like to get some feedback on.
>>>
>>> If you currently ask for property chains, you need something like the
>>> following:
>>>
>
On Freitag, 6. Juni 2008, CNIT wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > I have a proposal for a simplification in #ask query syntax that I would
> > like to get some feedback on.
> >
> > If you currently ask for property chains, you need something like the
> > following:
> >
> > {{#ask: [[works at::[[located
> > in:
Hi all,
> I have a proposal for a simplification in #ask query syntax that I would like
> to get some feedback on.
>
> If you currently ask for property chains, you need something like the
> following:
>
> {{#ask: [[works at::[[located in::[[population::>100]]}}
>
> to find someone workin
Hi all,
I have a proposal for a simplification in #ask query syntax that I would like
to get some feedback on.
If you currently ask for property chains, you need something like the
following:
{{#ask: [[works at::[[located in::[[population::>100]]}}
to find someone working at an organi
11 matches
Mail list logo
