On Donnerstag, 4. März 2010, CNIT wrote:
> 03.03.2010 20:21, Markus Krötzsch пишет:
> > Oh, and I also forgot about this question ...
> >
> > On Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2010, Solbrig, Harold R. wrote:
> >> Markus,
> >>
> >> I am trying to visualize how this information would be represented in
> >> RD
03.03.2010 20:21, Markus Krötzsch пишет:
> Oh, and I also forgot about this question ...
>
> On Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2010, Solbrig, Harold R. wrote:
>
>> Markus,
>>
>> I am trying to visualize how this information would be represented in
>> RDF. If we are defining predicate "X", it would seem
Oh, and I also forgot about this question ...
On Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2010, Solbrig, Harold R. wrote:
> Markus,
>
> I am trying to visualize how this information would be represented in
> RDF. If we are defining predicate "X", it would seem that the "has type"
> predicate would translate to "ran