[SMW-devel] making result format compatible with more versions of SMW

Hi Jeroen! I've seen that in the last version of Validator a lot of stuff have been refactored. The sideeffect of that is that I don't know how result format can be compatible with both versions of Validator. Can you provide any recipe for that? - Yury Katkov, WikiVote --

Re: [SMW-devel] making result format compatible with more versions of SMW

Hey Yury, If you use the array based syntax currently used by SMW and SRF, then it should be mostly compatible with Validator 0.5 (and thus SMW 1.8). IIRC most result printers in SMW 1.8 already got updated to use this definition style. I can't give you a better answer then that. Cheers -- Jeroe

[SMW-devel] SRF JitGraph

All, This is just a courtesy email to inform you that I've recently been doing some work on the JitGraph plugin for SRF (currently in alpha due to compatibility reasons) to make it work with later versions of SRF. Aside from hoping that this does not clash with anyone else, I also wanted to inqui

[SMW-devel] dagre graph and seq

While there is discussion of SRF graphs… I hacked in support for dagre graphs — see https://wiki.deflect.ca/wiki/BotnetDBP#Diagram this is a JavaScript implementation of graphviz style rendering. lots of possibilities due to its browser based nature. this imple