Re: Possible Bug for Oracle

2008-11-25 Thread Jeremy Evans
On Nov 24, 3:08 pm, Wesley Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Based on the documentation here:http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statem... It would appear that the 'AS' keyword is optional in the places where the patch would have an affect. I tested the patch

Re: Possible Bug for Oracle

2008-11-25 Thread Wesley Moore
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Jeremy Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, applied: http://github.com/jeremyevans/sequel/commit/0c7c893c5093337008f59de6885bd682cf8d327b Do the Oracle adapter specs run correctly? Did you try running the integration tests with the Oracle adapter?

Re: Possible Bug for Oracle

2008-11-25 Thread Jeremy Evans
On Nov 25, 2:55 pm, Wesley Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Jeremy Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, applied:http://github.com/jeremyevans/sequel/commit/0c7c893c5093337008f59de68... Do the Oracle adapter specs run correctly?  Did you try running the

Re: Possible Bug for Oracle

2008-11-24 Thread Wesley Moore
Based on the documentation here: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_10002.htm#i2065646 It would appear that the 'AS' keyword is optional in the places where the patch would have an affect. I tested the patch against commit