On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Mark Van De Vyver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Devs,
> I've been wrestling with Sequel and MySQL, somethings seem broken and
> I've logged tickets for those, and a fix where I could.
> I'm not sure that the following is an error or just my incorrect use
> o
On Feb 21, 10:56 am, xraid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> where can one se this implementation ?
It's in the Google Group's files:
http://sequel-talk.googlegroups.com/web/sequel_associations.rb?gda=6CIKf0cAAACjj0h3C_nyRJEDrvK-YRwo1DekjSbC49EhwHeTaDPVrGG1qiJ7UbTIup-M2XPURDRdoKX9C_IEpR8gxO_6Dcxsf6xKx
where can one se this implementation ?
On Feb 20, 8:39 pm, Jeremy Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since there isn't any reflection metadata currently kept for
> associations, I came up with a new associations implementation that
> handles the three most common relationships (many_to_one, one_t
Thanks for the reply. I will certainly check out your implementation,
hopefully this weekend. I've been dying to get off activerecord and
move to sequel. I have done it in a few one-off simple
implementations or scripts. The one thing holding me back on more
complicated apps is the relationshi
Hi Devs,
I've been wrestling with Sequel and MySQL, somethings seem broken and
I've logged tickets for those, and a fix where I could.
I'm not sure that the following is an error or just my incorrect use
of Sequel's threading, I've read a couple of posts about how to use
threads, but they seem to
