RE: Future direction for James

> Noel, does the above summarise "the major thought in [your] head"? Very much so. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: james-server/src/xdocs provided_mailets_2_1.xml

noel2003/11/16 13:47:24 Modified:src/conf Tag: branch_2_1_fcs james-config.xml sqlResources.xml src/java/org/apache/james/mailrepository Tag: branch_2_1_fcs AvalonSpoolRepository.java JDBCSpoolRepository.java

cvs commit: james-server/src/java/org/apache/james/mailrepository/filepair File_Persistent_Stream_Repository.java

noel2003/11/16 13:37:20 Modified:src/java/org/apache/james/mailrepository/filepair Tag: branch_2_1_fcs File_Persistent_Stream_Repository.java Log: Fixed bug pointed out by Mark Daring. Harmless in our case because never exercised,

RE: Future direction for James

Noel J. Bergman wrote: > I think that the major thought in my head was that the > processor would have > more full access to James, as opposed to the portable Mailet > container. Ah! You mean that creates an instance of class LinearProcessor, which currently is hardcoded to launch the Mailet cont

Bug report for James [2003/11/16]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned