[jira] Closed: (JAMES-275) src distrinution doesnt build, missing phoenix stuff.

Message: The following issue has been closed. Resolver: Danny Angus Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 2:28 AM DuH! My bad this isn't a defect - View the issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-275 Here is an

[jira] Assigned: (JAMES-275) src distrinution doesnt build, missing phoenix stuff.

Message: The following issue has been re-assigned. Assignee: Danny Angus (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) - View the issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-275 Here is an overview of the issue:

Source Routing

Hi, Okay we just ran into the following at a site, where James is setup as a mailprocessing gateway. The backend system (apparently it must have a few years on it's back) uses addresses like: @YYY.XXX.DK:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ie. the old RFC-821 source route style. Now James hickups at this

java -server

Hello Has anyone ever tried running James with the server option to enable the HotSpot Server engine? What were your experiences, does it make a difference, is it recommended, etc? Just curious. Hes. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hes

[VOTE] Release James 2.2.0RC5 as James v2.2.0

[ ] +1 - Release james 2.2.0RC5 as James 2.2.0 [ ] -1 - Do not release due to ___ --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: java -server

Has anyone ever tried running James with the server option Yes. I don't recall the performance difference, but I seem to recall that it was significant. However, prior to JVM 1.4.2, there were problems that could cause a lockup. --- Noel

RE: [VOTE] Release James 2.2.0RC5 as James v2.2.0

[X] +1 - Release james 2.2.0RC5 as James 2.2.0 -Chris (user) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]