[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-369?page=all ]
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini closed JAMES-369:
---
I'm satisfied :-)
Always announce AUTH capability to clients
--
Key: JAMES-369
* Is it useful/desirable to parse the message-id field (into left and
right parts)? I get the impression that a relatively high number of
mail messages have syntactically illegal message-id values--two @ signs
seems to be a particularly common offense. Since the message-id is
really
Yup, in our server i decided to just catch Throwables from the bounce
attempt (if a bounce fails, tough!)
Still, it seems a little concerning that the server may get low on memory,
then attempt to deliver a reasonably sized mail (within server limits) and
fail, and consequently keep repeating
Noel wrote:
Although the scope of validation covers that neccessary to determine
that
we will accept the responsibility for delivery, which can lead to some
other
things. For example, I would probably configure virtual user mapping
within
the protocol handler, which would allow me to reject
Alexander,
your configuration example:
smtp-processor
!-- Sender based checks. --
matcher class=SenderCheck
command MAIL FROM /command
action accept /action
code 220 /code
description ... /description
/matcher
/smtp-processor
Looks just fine,
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 16:25 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
First, it isn't part of JAMES, and this is core functionality that we have
wanted to add (discussion on the list goes back several years, but it hasn't
been of the highest priority). Second, james-ha is under the LGPL, which is
not an
Jason Webb and other JAMES comitters,
I would like to work on this project. I am a junior computer science student
at Baylor University. I hope that you can point in me in a direction where I
can learn a bit more about what this project entails and thereby decide if I
have anything to offer.
I could work on Fast-fail, especially since I've worked on it in my company
:-)
However, it seems a lot of ppl are already interested and quite capable.
Would you rather me to focus on clustering or have several ppl proposes
fast-fail?
nicolas
2005/6/4, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--On Sunday, June 05, 2005 8:38 PM -0400 Noel J. Bergman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most attachment types are filtered out by our mail filters. Very
little can get through on most ASF mailing lists. Your attachment
didn't make it. Please post text e-mail.
And eventually all of these proposals
Stefano,
I wouldn't like the SMTP server to read the code that an handler returns
and decide how to behave dependently on the first char of that code.
I agree with that concern, which isn't generally exposed in the my version
of the fast-fail proposal. In the case where I show a general case,
By the way, did I miss a patch where you changed the bounce
mailet? I'm seeing the DSNStatus inner class still there, as
well as the new copy of it that is in mail/dsn/DSNStatus.
--- Noel
My DSNBounce is totally different from the one in trunk. Actually I named my
bounce handling
11 matches
Mail list logo