Hi,
I don't think we need to support non-streaming solutions in mime4j.. But
that's only my idea..
bye
Norman
Am Donnerstag, den 20.09.2007, 21:53 +0100 schrieb Robert Burrell
Donkin:
i'd like to gauge opinions about whether anyone else feels strongly
about supporting non-streaming inputs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529337
]
Niklas Therning commented on MIME4J-6:
--
The idea is to make the Message class and friends be able to do this so
Modified:
james/jsieve/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/jsieve/util/check/ScriptCheckMailAdapterActionsTest.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/jsieve/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/jsieve/util/check/ScriptCheckMailAdapterActionsTest.java?rev=578031r1=578030r2=578031view=diff
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 02:54:42 2007
New Revision: 578036
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578036view=rev
Log:
Fix compilation bug I forgot while moving exceptions to their own package.
Modified:
james/jsieve/trunk/src/main/jjtree/sieve/sieve.jjt
Modified:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSIEVE-17?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Bagnara resolved JSIEVE-17.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Stefano Bagnara
Reformatted all of the java files.
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 03:04:30 2007
New Revision: 578037
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578037view=rev
Log:
Restore java 1.4 compatibility. new StringBuffer(CharSequence) is a java5
constructor.
Modified:
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 03:10:50 2007
New Revision: 578042
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578042view=rev
Log:
The XML APIs we use are part of the standard J2SE 1.4, so there's no need to
use and bundle them.
Removed:
james/jsieve/trunk/lib/xercesImpl-2.6.0.jar
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 03:36:30 2007
New Revision: 578052
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578052view=rev
Log:
check-targets for javamail and activation is not needed anymore as SUN released
that jars under the CDDL and we added them to our lib folder since months.
Removed:
Added: james/jsieve/trunk/stage/org.apache.james/poms/james-parent-1.1.pom
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/jsieve/trunk/stage/org.apache.james/poms/james-parent-1.1.pom?rev=578055view=auto
==
---
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 03:45:56 2007
New Revision: 578056
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578056view=rev
Log:
Refactored lib folder to stage folder like we have in other JAMES product.
This allow us to easily share the dependencies between the ant build and the
maven build.
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 03:46:55 2007
New Revision: 578057
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578057view=rev
Log:
Refactored lib folder to stage folder like we have in other JAMES product.
This allow us to easily share the dependencies between the ant build and the
maven build.
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 04:09:06 2007
New Revision: 578059
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578059view=rev
Log:
added eclipse instructions to BUILDING.txt
Modified:
james/jsieve/trunk/BUILDING.txt
Modified: james/jsieve/trunk/BUILDING.txt
URL:
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 04:09:21 2007
New Revision: 578060
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578060view=rev
Log:
fixed a minor dependency issue in pom.xml
Modified:
james/jsieve/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: james/jsieve/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
Author: norman
Date: Fri Sep 21 04:14:36 2007
New Revision: 578063
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578063view=rev
Log:
[maven-release-plugin] prepare release james-project-1.2
Modified:
james/project/trunk/project/pom.xml
james/project/trunk/project/server/2.2.0/pom.xml
Author: norman
Date: Fri Sep 21 04:14:49 2007
New Revision: 578066
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578066view=rev
Log:
[maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration
Modified:
james/project/trunk/project/pom.xml
james/project/trunk/project/server/2.2.0/pom.xml
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 04:10:48 2007
New Revision: 578062
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578062view=rev
Log:
svn ignoring eclipse resources
Modified:
james/jsieve/trunk/ (props changed)
Propchange: james/jsieve/trunk/
Author: norman
Date: Fri Sep 21 04:14:43 2007
New Revision: 578064
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578064view=rev
Log:
[maven-release-plugin] copy for tag james-project-1.2
Added:
james/project/tags/james-project-1.2/
- copied from r577752, james/project/trunk/project/
On 9/21/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
robert burrell donkin-2 wrote:
i'd like to gauge opinions about whether anyone else feels strongly
about supporting non-streaming inputs for MimeTokenStream. i've been
keeping
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 06:50:08 2007
New Revision: 578105
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578105view=rev
Log:
update parent project to the 1.2 staged release.
Added:
james/jspf/trunk/stage/org.apache.james/poms/james-project-1.2.pom
Author: norman
Date: Fri Sep 21 06:59:54 2007
New Revision: 578114
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578114view=rev
Log:
[maven-release-plugin] prepare release apache-jspf-0.9.5
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: james/jspf/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
Author: norman
Date: Fri Sep 21 07:00:00 2007
New Revision: 578115
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578115view=rev
Log:
[maven-release-plugin] copy for tag apache-jspf-0.9.5
Added:
james/jspf/tags/apache-jspf-0.9.5/
- copied from r578112, james/jspf/trunk/
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 06:55:23 2007
New Revision: 578112
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578112view=rev
Log:
another minor issue in the comments
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: james/jspf/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 06:54:07 2007
New Revision: 578108
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578108view=rev
Log:
forgot to commit this..
Added:
james/jspf/trunk/src/test/resources/org/apache/james/jspf/pysqf.LICENSE
Added:
On 9/20/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'd like to gauge opinions about whether anyone else feels strongly
about supporting non-streaming inputs for MimeTokenStream. i've been
keeping this in mind whilst reviewing jochen's patches but this has
lead to conflicts about the
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 06:53:36 2007
New Revision: 578106
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578106view=rev
Log:
minor update to pom comment
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: james/jspf/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
Author: norman
Date: Fri Sep 21 07:14:20 2007
New Revision: 578136
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578136view=rev
Log:
[maven-release-plugin] prepare release apache-jspf-0.9.5
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: james/jspf/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
Author: norman
Date: Fri Sep 21 07:14:26 2007
New Revision: 578138
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578138view=rev
Log:
[maven-release-plugin] copy for tag apache-jspf-0.9.5
Added:
james/jspf/tags/apache-jspf-0.9.5/
- copied from r578131, james/jspf/trunk/
Author: norman
Date: Fri Sep 21 07:14:30 2007
New Revision: 578139
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578139view=rev
Log:
[maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: james/jspf/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 07:12:19 2007
New Revision: 578131
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578131view=rev
Log:
Revert releasing process.
Modified:
james/jspf/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: james/jspf/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 07:08:18 2007
New Revision: 578124
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578124view=rev
Log:
Remove tag made by mistake, so to make space for a new maven:prepare
Removed:
james/jspf/tags/apache-jspf-0.9.5/
Author: bago
Date: Fri Sep 21 07:40:21 2007
New Revision: 578146
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578146view=rev
Log:
Updated the HOWTO_RELEASE based on the last issues found when preparing.
Modified:
james/project/trunk/HOWTO_RELEASE.txt
Modified: james/project/trunk/HOWTO_RELEASE.txt
Hi dev's ,
Stefano and me finally found the time to prepare for next jSPF
release...
We did a james-project release preparation too because of some
dependencies problems we had in the past ( did some failure by mistake).
So please review and VOTE ;-) We will be the first and only asynchron /
Author: norman
Date: Fri Sep 21 10:39:00 2007
New Revision: 578210
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578210view=rev
Log:
Fix some typos
Add more documentation about needed steps for getting the right metadata.
Modified:
james/project/trunk/HOWTO.txt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529515
]
Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-589:
-
Just to remember this:
http://vafer.org/projects/jdeb/howto.html
Build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529521
]
Norman Maurer commented on JAMES-752:
-
Can someone ( Robert, Noel ) check if there are any updates on legal stuff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Norman Maurer resolved JAMES-787.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
I think this will not get fixed in 2.3.x ..
Unable to resolv
Author: norman
Date: Fri Sep 21 11:43:56 2007
New Revision: 578223
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=578223view=rev
Log:
More typo's corrected
Add docu about copy artifacts to maven repo
Modified:
james/project/trunk/HOWTO_RELEASE.txt
Modified: james/project/trunk/HOWTO_RELEASE.txt
URL:
Am Freitag, den 21.09.2007, 15:30 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
it's really about objectives and aims rather than technical designs
i wonder whether it's worthwhile having what's probably going to be a
long technical discussion about a design for a unified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12529536
]
Norman Maurer commented on JSPF-55:
---
More infos can be found under:
http://www.libsrs2.org/
Maybe it whould be
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
it's really about objectives and aims rather than technical designs
i wonder whether it's worthwhile having what's probably going to be a
long technical discussion about a design for a unified parser for both
streams and non-streams. if no one else really feels
40 matches
Mail list logo
