Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > It sounds OK, so +1 in general, but with all of the refactoring, we've
> > making it increasingly difficult to compare versions of JAMES. This
would
> > not be so bad if we had ever made a stable baseline prior to the
> > refactorings, but
Author: rdonkin
Date: Tue Mar 4 14:02:26 2008
New Revision: 633666
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=633666&view=rev
Log:
Torque search query.
Added:
james/server/trunk/torque-mailboxmanager-function/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailboxmanager/torque/SearchUtils.java
james/server
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
trunk was forked from 2.3.0 several years ago now and contains
significant differences not only in organisation but also design. i
doubt whether anyone has the time required to perform a comprehensive
manual comparison now whether the mailets are in trunk or else
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
