Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Jun 19 15:10:35 2008
New Revision: 669724
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=669724&view=rev
Log:
Use generated dependencies, LICENSE, NOTICE for binary
Modified:
james/jsieve/trunk/src/assemble/bin.xml
Modified: james/jsieve/trunk/src/assemble/bin.xml
URL:
http
Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Jun 19 15:03:13 2008
New Revision: 669721
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=669721&view=rev
Log:
BND missing from license
Modified:
james/jsieve/trunk/LICENSE.txt
Modified: james/jsieve/trunk/LICENSE.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/jsieve/trunk/LICE
Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Jun 19 14:59:17 2008
New Revision: 669714
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=669714&view=rev
Log:
Ignore jars just in case JavaCC is installed at top level
Modified:
james/jsieve/trunk/src/assemble/src.xml
Modified: james/jsieve/trunk/src/assemble/src.xml
URL:
h
Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Jun 19 14:56:35 2008
New Revision: 669713
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=669713&view=rev
Log:
Use LICENSE and NOTICE from source
Modified:
james/jsieve/trunk/src/assemble/src.xml
Modified: james/jsieve/trunk/src/assemble/src.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/vi
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:27 PM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> So I seem to have provoked much more discussion than I intended here.
don't worry - seems to happen a lot here :-)
> I don't know if its best practice, policy, or my misunderstanding but I think
> the following are s
Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Jun 19 14:34:25 2008
New Revision: 669706
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=669706&view=rev
Log:
Deleted unneccessary verbage
Modified:
james/jsieve/trunk/NOTICE.txt
Modified: james/jsieve/trunk/NOTICE.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/jsieve/trunk/NO
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Bernd Fondermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefano Bagnara
So I seem to have provoked much more discussion than I intended here.
I don't know if its best practice, policy, or my misunderstanding but
I think the following are supposed to happen:
1. expected svn checkout points are supposed to include LICENSE and
NOTICE files at their root coveri
Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Jun 19 14:24:10 2008
New Revision: 669702
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=669702&view=rev
Log:
Upgraded apache-jar-resource-bundle
Modified:
james/jsieve/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: james/jsieve/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/jsieve/trunk/p
Author: rdonkin
Date: Thu Jun 19 14:19:41 2008
New Revision: 669701
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=669701&view=rev
Log:
Improve POM by excluding transitive dependencies
Modified:
james/jsieve/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: james/jsieve/trunk/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-21?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12606559#action_12606559
]
Robert Burrell Donkin commented on MIME4J-21:
-
Jochen - is this ok with you?
>
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A comment of Stefano's on the Geronimo integration thread reminded me of an
> issue I had with the James servers while I was developing the Geronimo
> javamail providers. Originally, I started out using James as my test ser
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[E
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> My understanding of something that belongs to LICENSE ended up in NOTICE
>>> because Daniel Kulp
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
If you want to strictly follow #2 rule then all of them will need a
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My understanding of something that belongs to LICENSE ended up in NOTICE
because Daniel Kulp and Me had different instructions or misunderstood Cliff
"directives".
cliff tends towards
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
I remember I hit this issue in past. IIRC sun's javamail does not add
the BODY=8BITMIME attribute for the MAIL command, and it also does not
add the SIZE=X attribute when the SIZE extension is supported.
Okthe SIZE extension is one I'm not aware of. Where's the RF
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> If you want to strictly follow #2 rule then all of them will need a
>>> different NOTI
I remember I hit this issue in past. IIRC sun's javamail does not add
the BODY=8BITMIME attribute for the MAIL command, and it also does not
add the SIZE=X attribute when the SIZE extension is supported.
I vaguely remember that servers supporting 8BITMIME extension correctly
default to 8BI
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> In most Licenses for product I use I read a lot of boilerplate that does
>>> not
>>> apply
I was looking at some things in the Geronimo SMTPTransport code, and I
realized that I had never implemented adding the BODY=8BITMIME to the
FROM command. I went back to my test case I used for comparisons
purposes. This did a simple send with the mail.smtp.allow8bitmime
property set to true.
A comment of Stefano's on the Geronimo integration thread reminded me of
an issue I had with the James servers while I was developing the
Geronimo javamail providers. Originally, I started out using James as
my test server for the providers, but sort of hit a wall when it came to
testing out t
Am Donnerstag, den 19.06.2008, 13:38 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> >>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
We also depend on com.sun.mail.util.CRLFOutputStream but w
Sam Ruby (JIRA) ha scritto:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12606064#action_12606064 ]
Sam Ruby commented on LEGAL-22:
---
Larry says that we will probably ha
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
If you want to strictly follow #2 rule then all of them will need a
different NOTICE/LICENSE for each package but as you can see this is an
extensive list and they all use the same
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In most Licenses for product I use I read a lot of boilerplate that does not
apply to the specific product I use, but the licensor simply use the same
license for each product. Some t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-30?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12606302#action_12606302
]
Oleg Kalnichevski commented on MIME4J-30:
-
Folks,
Is there anything I could do to h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-21?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oleg Kalnichevski updated MIME4J-21:
Attachment: headlessmime.patch
This patch should take care of the problem. I did my best to
An automated nightly build of JAMES has been posted to
http://people.apache.org/builds/james/nightly/
Any unit test errors from the build should be reported below:
-
30 matches
Mail list logo
