Re: [VOTE] Release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standard 1.1

2011-05-12 Thread Norman Maurer
I will close the VOTE on 14.05.2011 09:00 CEST. Thanks, Norman 2011/5/12 Eric Charles : > [x] +1 Yeah, go ahead, release protocols 1.4 > [x] +1 Yeah, go ahead, release standard-mailets 1.1 > > Those libs correctly serve traffic since 1 day in deployed james-server > Tks, > - Eric > > On 10/05/20

[jira] [Closed] (MAILBOX-9) JPAMessageMapper.search(....) should use JPL query which match the SearchQuery

2011-05-12 Thread Norman Maurer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-9?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Norman Maurer closed MAILBOX-9. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.2 Assignee: Norman Maurer After thinking more about

[jira] [Resolved] (MAILBOX-61) Merge MailboxMembership and Message interfaces and implementation

2011-05-12 Thread Norman Maurer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Norman Maurer resolved MAILBOX-61. -- Resolution: Fixed done > Merge MailboxMembership and Message interfaces and implementation > -

[jira] [Created] (MAILBOX-66) MessageSearches does not handle comments in From/To/Cc/Bcc the right way

2011-05-12 Thread Norman Maurer (JIRA)
MessageSearches does not handle comments in From/To/Cc/Bcc the right way Key: MAILBOX-66 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-66 Project: James Mailbox Is

Re: Notes On orgapachejames-002 [WAS Re: [VOTE] Release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standard 1.1

2011-05-12 Thread Norman Maurer
Hi there, I guess thsi should be fixed in next release. Would you mind open a bugreport ? Thanks, Norman 2011/5/12 Robert Burrell Donkin : > Some notes (not necessarily blockers for me) > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Norman Maurer > wrote: > >> standard-mailets 1.1: >> >> Review url: >> h

Re: [VOTE] Release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standard 1.1

2011-05-12 Thread Eric Charles
[x] +1 Yeah, go ahead, release protocols 1.4 [x] +1 Yeah, go ahead, release standard-mailets 1.1 Those libs correctly serve traffic since 1 day in deployed james-server Tks, - Eric On 10/05/2011 20:27, Norman Maurer wrote: Hi there, this is the VOTE for release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standa

Re: [VOTE] Release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standard 1.1

2011-05-12 Thread Stefano Bagnara
2011/5/10 Norman Maurer : > So please cast your VOTE. > > protocols 1.4: > > Review url: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-003 [X] +1 Yeah, go ahead > standard-mailets 1.1: > > Review url: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-002 [

Re: [VOTE] Release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standard 1.1

2011-05-12 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
[X] + 0 No time to review Sorry, I'm not able now to examine the whole thing ... If my vote becomes crucial, let me know. Ciao, Vincenzo 2011/5/10 Norman Maurer > Hi there, > > this is the VOTE for release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standard 1.1. > Both releases are needed for james-server 3.

Re: [VOTE] Release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standard 1.1

2011-05-12 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Norman Maurer wrote: > protocols 1.4: > > Review url: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-003 > > [X] +1 Yeah, go ahead > [ ] + 0 No time to review > [ ] -1 There is a bug we need to fix first The JDK issue (see other thread) isn't

Notes On orgapachejames-003 [WAS Re: Notes On orgapachejames-002]

2011-05-12 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > Some notes (not necessarily blockers for me) > 1. Target JDK > > (FTR I'm comfortable with moving all new releases to 1.6) > > Target JDK[1] is 1.5 but release is compiled with 1.6.0_24. I wondered > whether the aim was to build a

Re: [VOTE] Release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standard 1.1

2011-05-12 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Norman Maurer wrote: > standard-mailets 1.1: > > Review url: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-002 > > [X] +1 Yeah, go ahead > [ ] + 0 No time to review > [ ] -1 There is a bug we need to fix first Found a couple of issues (see

Notes On orgapachejames-002 [WAS Re: [VOTE] Release protocols 1.4 and mailets-standard 1.1

2011-05-12 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
Some notes (not necessarily blockers for me) On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Norman Maurer wrote: > standard-mailets 1.1: > > Review url: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-002 1. Target JDK (FTR I'm comfortable with moving all new releases to 1.6) Target JDK

svn commit: r1102195 - /james/mailbox/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/MailboxQuery.java

2011-05-12 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Thu May 12 07:56:33 2011 New Revision: 1102195 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1102195&view=rev Log: Correctly handle * and % wildcards. See MAILBOX-65 Modified: james/mailbox/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/mailbox/MailboxQuery.java Modified: james/mail