svn commit: r1222088 - in /james/protocols/trunk: api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/protocols/api/ProtocolSessionImpl.java smtp/src/main/java/org/apache/james/protocols/smtp/SMTPSessionImpl.java

2011-12-21 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Thu Dec 22 07:54:55 2011 New Revision: 1222088 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1222088&view=rev Log: cleanup Modified: james/protocols/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/protocols/api/ProtocolSessionImpl.java james/protocols/trunk/smtp/src/main/java/org/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.0-RC1

2011-12-21 Thread Norman Maurer
[x] +1 Yes, please release Bye, Norman 2011/12/21 Norman Maurer > Hi there, > > over the last few weeks I worked on improving the Apache James Protocols > code. I think after fixing the last outstanding bug today (Stefano, yay) we > are ready to release 1.6.0-RC1. > > The changes can be found

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.0-RC1

2011-12-21 Thread Felix Knecht
[X] +1 Yes, please release Felix On 12/21/2011 09:01 PM, Norman Maurer wrote: Hi there, over the last few weeks I worked on improving the Apache James Protocols code. I think after fixing the last outstanding bug today (Stefano, yay) we are ready to release 1.6.0-RC1. The changes can be fou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.0-RC1

2011-12-21 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino
[X] +1 Yes, please release Manolo On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > 2011/12/21 Norman Maurer : > > Hi there, > > > > over the last few weeks I worked on improving the Apache James Protocols > code. I think after fixing the last outstanding bug today (Stefano, yay) we >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.0-RC1

2011-12-21 Thread Stefano Bagnara
2011/12/21 Norman Maurer : > Hi there, > > over the last few weeks I worked on improving the Apache James Protocols > code. I think after fixing the last outstanding bug today (Stefano, yay) we > are ready to release 1.6.0-RC1. > > The changes can be found here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/s

svn commit: r1221885 - /james/mailbox/trunk/pom.xml

2011-12-21 Thread ieugen
Author: ieugen Date: Wed Dec 21 21:08:09 2011 New Revision: 1221885 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221885&view=rev Log: Bumped hadoop dependency version to 0.20.205.0 which includes the append patch. Modified: james/mailbox/trunk/pom.xml Modified: james/mailbox/trunk/pom.xml URL: ht

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.0-RC1

2011-12-21 Thread Ioan Eugen Stan
> [ ] +1 Yes, please release > [x] +0 No time to review > [ ] -1 Something is wrong -- Ioan Eugen Stan http://ieugen.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mai

[VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.6.0-RC1

2011-12-21 Thread Norman Maurer
Hi there, over the last few weeks I worked on improving the Apache James Protocols code. I think after fixing the last outstanding bug today (Stefano, yay) we are ready to release 1.6.0-RC1. The changes can be found here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=123110

[jira] [Resolved] (PROTOCOLS-62) AbstractProtocolTransport does not write the Response's in the right order if FutureResponse and Response implements get written in a mixed fashion

2011-12-21 Thread Norman Maurer (Resolved) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTOCOLS-62?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Norman Maurer resolved PROTOCOLS-62. Resolution: Fixed Fixed by stefano's commit. Thanks! > AbstractProtocolT

svn commit: r1221859 - in /james/protocols/trunk: api/pom.xml lmtp/pom.xml netty/pom.xml pom.xml pop3/pom.xml smtp/pom.xml

2011-12-21 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Wed Dec 21 19:49:45 2011 New Revision: 1221859 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221859&view=rev Log: [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration Modified: james/protocols/trunk/api/pom.xml james/protocols/trunk/lmtp/pom.xml james/protocols/

svn commit: r1221858 - /james/protocols/tags/protocols-1.6.0-RC1/

2011-12-21 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Wed Dec 21 19:49:28 2011 New Revision: 1221858 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221858&view=rev Log: [maven-release-plugin] copy for tag protocols-1.6.0-RC1 Added: james/protocols/tags/protocols-1.6.0-RC1/ - copied from r1221857, james/protocols/trunk/

svn commit: r1221857 - in /james/protocols/trunk: api/pom.xml lmtp/pom.xml netty/pom.xml pom.xml pop3/pom.xml smtp/pom.xml

2011-12-21 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Wed Dec 21 19:49:01 2011 New Revision: 1221857 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221857&view=rev Log: [maven-release-plugin] prepare release protocols-1.6.0-RC1 Modified: james/protocols/trunk/api/pom.xml james/protocols/trunk/lmtp/pom.xml james/protocols/tru

Re: svn commit: r1221748 - /james/protocols/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/protocols/api/AbstractProtocolTransport.java

2011-12-21 Thread Norman Maurer
This makes sense! Thanks for taking care. I will cut a new release now that this is fixed. I think I will call it 1.6.0-RC1 as we are really close ;) Bye, Norman -- Norman Maurer Am Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2011 um 15:47 schrieb b...@apache.org: > Author: bago > Date: Wed Dec 21 14:47:25 2011

svn commit: r1221853 - /james/protocols/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/protocols/api/handler/DisconnectHandler.java

2011-12-21 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Wed Dec 21 19:40:00 2011 New Revision: 1221853 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221853&view=rev Log: minor javadoc update Modified: james/protocols/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/protocols/api/handler/DisconnectHandler.java Modified: james/protocols/tru

svn commit: r1221852 - in /james/protocols/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/protocols/api: BaseRequest.java ProtocolSession.java ProtocolTransport.java

2011-12-21 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Wed Dec 21 19:38:12 2011 New Revision: 1221852 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221852&view=rev Log: Remove @deprecated methods and add some javadocs Modified: james/protocols/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/protocols/api/BaseRequest.java james/protoc

svn commit: r1221749 - /james/protocols/trunk/pop3/

2011-12-21 Thread bago
Author: bago Date: Wed Dec 21 14:47:43 2011 New Revision: 1221749 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221749&view=rev Log: Remove eclipse artifacts Modified: james/protocols/trunk/pop3/ (props changed) Propchange: james/protocols/trunk/pop3/ -

svn commit: r1221748 - /james/protocols/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/protocols/api/AbstractProtocolTransport.java

2011-12-21 Thread bago
Author: bago Date: Wed Dec 21 14:47:25 2011 New Revision: 1221748 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221748&view=rev Log: An attempt to refactor AbstractProtocolTransport to be thread safe. I moved back to standard synchronization as we only have max 2 threads competing for the queue so it d

svn commit: r1221744 - in /james/protocols/trunk/pop3: .classpath .project .settings/

2011-12-21 Thread bago
Author: bago Date: Wed Dec 21 14:39:56 2011 New Revision: 1221744 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221744&view=rev Log: Remove eclipse artifacts Removed: james/protocols/trunk/pop3/.classpath james/protocols/trunk/pop3/.project james/protocols/trunk/pop3/.settings/ ---

svn commit: r1221743 - /james/protocols/trunk/api/pom.xml

2011-12-21 Thread bago
Author: bago Date: Wed Dec 21 14:38:57 2011 New Revision: 1221743 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221743&view=rev Log: Add junit dependency for api module Modified: james/protocols/trunk/api/pom.xml Modified: james/protocols/trunk/api/pom.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/p

svn commit: r1221742 - /james/protocols/trunk/api/src/test/java/org/apache/james/protocols/api/AbstractProtocolTransportTest.java

2011-12-21 Thread bago
Author: bago Date: Wed Dec 21 14:38:34 2011 New Revision: 1221742 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221742&view=rev Log: java 5 doesn't like @override on interface implementations. Modified: james/protocols/trunk/api/src/test/java/org/apache/james/protocols/api/AbstractProtocolTransport

svn commit: r1221644 - /james/protocols/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/protocols/api/AbstractProtocolTransport.java

2011-12-21 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Wed Dec 21 08:36:01 2011 New Revision: 1221644 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221644&view=rev Log: Make sure the Responses are written in the correct order even if FutureResponse's and Response's get mixed. See PROTOCOLS-62 Modified: james/protocols/trunk/api/sr

svn commit: r1221640 - in /james/protocols/trunk/api/src/test: ./ java/ java/org/ java/org/apache/ java/org/apache/james/ java/org/apache/james/protocols/ java/org/apache/james/protocols/api/

2011-12-21 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Wed Dec 21 08:04:13 2011 New Revision: 1221640 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221640&view=rev Log: Add unit test as proof of PROTOCOLS-62 Added: james/protocols/trunk/api/src/test/ james/protocols/trunk/api/src/test/java/ james/protocols/trunk/api/src/test

[jira] [Resolved] (PROTOCOLS-61) FutureResponseImpl.setResponse(..) throws a NPE if no ResponseListener were registered before

2011-12-21 Thread Norman Maurer (Resolved) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTOCOLS-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Norman Maurer resolved PROTOCOLS-61. Resolution: Fixed fixed! > FutureResponseImpl.setResponse(..) throws a N

[jira] [Created] (PROTOCOLS-62) AbstractProtocolTransport does not write the Response's in the right order if FutureResponse and Response implements get written in a mixed fashion

2011-12-21 Thread Norman Maurer (Created) (JIRA)
AbstractProtocolTransport does not write the Response's in the right order if FutureResponse and Response implements get written in a mixed fashion ---

svn commit: r1221639 - /james/protocols/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/protocols/api/FutureResponseImpl.java

2011-12-21 Thread norman
Author: norman Date: Wed Dec 21 08:02:02 2011 New Revision: 1221639 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221639&view=rev Log: Fix NPE which was thrown when no ResponseListener is registered and setResponse(..) is called. See PROTOCOLS-61 Modified: james/protocols/trunk/api/src/main/java/o

[jira] [Created] (PROTOCOLS-61) FutureResponseImpl.setResponse(..) throws a NPE if no ResponseListener were registered before

2011-12-21 Thread Norman Maurer (Created) (JIRA)
FutureResponseImpl.setResponse(..) throws a NPE if no ResponseListener were registered before - Key: PROTOCOLS-61 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTOCOLS-61