[jira] [Created] (JAMES-1604) Compilation issue with Java 7

Tellier Benoit created JAMES-1604: - Summary: Compilation issue with Java 7 Key: JAMES-1604 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1604 Project: James Server Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Resolved] (JAMES-1604) Compilation issue with Java 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tellier Benoit resolved JAMES-1604. --- Resolution: Fixed Done Compilation issue with Java 7 -

Build failed in Jenkins: james-server-trunk #5351

See https://builds.apache.org/job/james-server-trunk/5351/changes Changes: [btellier] JAMES-1604 Fix assertj version -- [...truncated 2556 lines...] Archived 1 artifacts Archive block size is 32768 Received 0 blocks and 3522 bytes Compression is 0.0% Took

Build failed in Jenkins: james-server-trunk » Apache James :: Server :: Mailbox Adapter #5351

See https://builds.apache.org/job/james-server-trunk/org.apache.james$james-server-mailbox-adapter/5351/ -- [INFO] [INFO]

svn commit: r1698269 - /james/server/trunk/pom.xml

Author: btellier Date: Fri Aug 28 07:15:29 2015 New Revision: 1698269 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1698269 Log: JAMES-1604 Fix assertj version Modified: james/server/trunk/pom.xml Modified: james/server/trunk/pom.xml URL:

[jira] [Commented] (JDKIM-36) DKIMVerifier returns only valid signatures if a message is signed multiple times and some dignature does not pass

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDKIM-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14718176#comment-14718176 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on JDKIM-36: -- {code} // There is no access to the

[jira] [Created] (JAMES-1605) AbstractRecipientRewriteTable.mapAddress doesn't respect domainAlias ordering

Matthieu Baechler created JAMES-1605: Summary: AbstractRecipientRewriteTable.mapAddress doesn't respect domainAlias ordering Key: JAMES-1605 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1605

[jira] [Created] (JDKIM-36) DKIMVerifier returns only valid signatures if a message is signed multiple times and some dignature does not pass

Enrico Olivelli created JDKIM-36: Summary: DKIMVerifier returns only valid signatures if a message is signed multiple times and some dignature does not pass Key: JDKIM-36 URL:

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-1605) AbstractRecipientRewriteTable.mapAddress doesn't respect domainAlias ordering

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14718304#comment-14718304 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JAMES-1605: --- GitHub user mbaechler opened a pull

Re: Proposal about James modules merge

Hi all, sorry for not having been active at all in the last period. Anyway, I agree with Ioan that using GIT is *much* more productive than using SVN, so I cast here my +1. Regards, Vincenzo Il giorno lun 24 ago 2015 alle ore 21:51 Ioan Eugen Stan stan.ieu...@gmail.com ha scritto: Hi,

[jira] [Updated] (JDKIM-36) DKIMVerifier returns only valid signatures if a message is signed multiple times and some signature does not pass

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDKIM-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Enrico Olivelli updated JDKIM-36: - Summary: DKIMVerifier returns only valid signatures if a message is signed multiple times and some

[jira] [Reopened] (JAMES-1604) Compilation issue with Java 7

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tellier Benoit reopened JAMES-1604: --- Compilation issue with Java 7 - Key: JAMES-1604

Re: Proposal about James modules merge

Hi Vincenzo and Ioan While Mattiheu's proposal does mention switching to GIT and I agree that GIT is superior to SVN and I support this, the most important part is the restructuring of our projects. As I have explained in an earlier post the proposed change abandons the façade that