Re: James logo – the Vote is Open

Hi there, Thank you Laura for this call for vote. Here is my vote : * VOTE FOR LOGO NUMBER: 10 Cheers, -- Matthieu Baechler Le 26/09/2016 à 16:04, Laura Royet a écrit : Hi everyone, This emails opens the *single vote ballot* for *James log**o*. Below are the detailed explanation. **Who

Re: James logo – the Vote is Open

Hello, yeah the last one looks great. * VOTE FOR LOGO NUMBER: 10 Cheers, Michael Le 26/09/2016 16:04, Laura Royet a écrit : Hi everyone, This emails opens the *single vote ballot* for *James log**o*. Below are the detailed explanation. **Who ca**n vote :* all the recipients of this email.

Re: James logo – the Vote is Open

Hi, maybe the last one, looks better... * VOTE FOR LOGO NUMBER: 10 Thanks and Regards, Shawn On Sep 26, 2016, at 10:04 PM, Laura Royet wrote: Hi everyone, This emails opens the *single vote ballot* for *James log**o*. Below are the detailed explanation. **Who ca**n

James logo – the Vote is Open

Hi everyone, This emails opens the *single vote ballot* for *James log**o*. Below are the detailed explanation. **Who ca**n vote :* all the recipients of this email. Deadline :Monday, 3 October 2016 at 18:00 UTC*. *How to vo**te : **You have two options : **choosing**one of the **proposals

Re: JAMES Acronym

The case should be reflected in the logo. So voting for logo implies voting for a case. On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Laura Royet wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Thank you for your answer. > Could you tell me if you learn more about this? > > Thanks > > Regards, > > Laura > > >

Re: Vote for James Logo

Sure, Laura can start the vote. On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Matthieu Baechler wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Good to read you on the list ! > > Laura proposed a vote that include all valid proposals. Would you agree to > launch this vote now ? > > Cheers, > > -- > Matthieu

Re: JAMES Acronym

Hi Eric, Thank you for your answer. Could you tell me if you learn more about this? Thanks Regards, Laura Le 24/09/2016 à 10:38, Eric Charles a écrit : Yep, you got it. We also considered some time ago moving from upper-case "JAMES" to "James". No sure if we concluded with a consensus