Hello Matthieu,
Sadly, I'm unable to see what you did write in the email you sent due to
the absence of quote.
Can you review your email client settings, in order to get a readable
output we can start discussing on?
This time, I made the effort, but I would greatly appreciate a better
display.
Hi Benoit,
On Fri, 2020-12-04 at 14:22 +0700, btell...@linagora.com (OpenPaaS) wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to increase overall efficiency of the Distributed
James server.
As such, I'm pocking around for improvement areas and found a huge
topic
around LWT.
My conclusions so far are that we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17245066#comment-17245066
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JAMES-2543:
---
jeantil opened a new pull request #275:
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17245063#comment-17245063
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JAMES-2543:
---
jeantil commented on pull request #270:
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17245064#comment-17245064
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JAMES-2543:
---
jeantil closed pull request #270:
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17245037#comment-17245037
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JAMES-2543:
---
chibenwa commented on pull request #270:
URL:
A quick follow up to state that
https://github.com/linagora/james-project/pull/4110 implemented that ;-)
Cheers,
Benoit
Le 03/12/2020 à 09:08, btell...@linagora.com (OpenPaaS) a écrit :
> Nice to see we are on the same wave length!
>
> Regarding the upgrade path, I'm in favor of requiring an
