[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'james/ApacheJames/master [master] [61]'

2021-04-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'james/ApacheJames/master [master] [61]': Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/james/job/ApacheJames/job/master/61/;>james/ApacheJames/master [master] [61]" - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'james/ApacheJames/master [master] [60]'

2021-04-06 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'james/ApacheJames/master [master] [60]': Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/james/job/ApacheJames/job/master/60/;>james/ApacheJames/master [master] [60]" - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Call for vote: Apache James 3.6.0 (round 3)

2021-04-06 Thread Rene Cordier
+1 Rene. On 06/04/2021 14:04, Tellier Benoit wrote: I would like to propose a new vote 3.6.0 release of the Apache James server. After an initial mistake (sorry), a failed vote (could not achieve a PMC quorum), and more issues I did not yet complain about (closing the maven artifact #1051

Re: [VOTE] Call for vote: Apache James 3.6.0 (round 3)

2021-04-06 Thread Jean Helou
go ! +1 :) On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 10:27 AM Antoine Duprat wrote: > +1 > > Le mar. 6 avr. 2021 à 09:04, Tellier Benoit a écrit > : > > > I would like to propose a new vote 3.6.0 release of the Apache James > > server. > > > > After an initial mistake (sorry), a failed vote (could not achieve a

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-3554) JMAP EventSource uncessary 'pushState' but no Event id

2021-04-06 Thread Benoit Tellier (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17315701#comment-17315701 ] Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-3554: --- Quick PR https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/368

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-3554) JMAP EventSource uncessary 'pushState' but no Event id

2021-04-06 Thread Benoit Tellier (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17315683#comment-17315683 ] Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-3554: --- To be honnest, I am reluctant to return SSE ids as long as

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-3554) JMAP EventSource uncessary 'pushState' but no Event id

2021-04-06 Thread Daniel Gultsch (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17315682#comment-17315682 ] Daniel Gultsch commented on JAMES-3554: --- Yes the EventSource id is indeed optional. However looking

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-3554) JMAP EventSource uncessary 'pushState' but no Event id

2021-04-06 Thread Benoit Tellier (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17315676#comment-17315676 ] Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-3554: --- pushState is defined in RFC-8887

[jira] [Created] (JAMES-3554) JMAP EventSource uncessary 'pushState' but no Event id

2021-04-06 Thread Daniel Gultsch (Jira)
Daniel Gultsch created JAMES-3554: - Summary: JMAP EventSource uncessary 'pushState' but no Event id Key: JAMES-3554 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3554 Project: James Server

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-3544) JMAP uploaded blobs are never deleted

2021-04-06 Thread Benoit Tellier (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17315415#comment-17315415 ] Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-3544: --- > There is an API proposal for blob deletion: >

[jira] [Commented] (JAMES-3544) JMAP uploaded blobs are never deleted

2021-04-06 Thread Raphael Ouazana (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17315390#comment-17315390 ] Raphael Ouazana commented on JAMES-3544: There is an API proposal for blob deletion:

Re: [VOTE] Call for vote: Apache James 3.6.0 (round 3)

2021-04-06 Thread Antoine Duprat
+1 Le mar. 6 avr. 2021 à 09:04, Tellier Benoit a écrit : > I would like to propose a new vote 3.6.0 release of the Apache James > server. > > After an initial mistake (sorry), a failed vote (could not achieve a PMC > quorum), and more issues I did not yet complain about (closing the maven >

Re: [VOTE] Call for vote: Apache James 3.6.0 (round 3)

2021-04-06 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
+1 Vincenzo On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 9:28 AM Rémi Kowalski < remi.florian.kowal...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Le mar. 6 avr. 2021 à 09:04, Tellier Benoit a écrit > : > > > I would like to propose a new vote 3.6.0 release of the Apache James > > server. > > > > After an initial mistake (sorry),

Re: [VOTE] Call for vote: Apache James 3.6.0 (round 3)

2021-04-06 Thread Rémi Kowalski
+1 Le mar. 6 avr. 2021 à 09:04, Tellier Benoit a écrit : > I would like to propose a new vote 3.6.0 release of the Apache James > server. > > After an initial mistake (sorry), a failed vote (could not achieve a PMC > quorum), and more issues I did not yet complain about (closing the maven >

Re: [VOTE] Call for vote: Apache James 3.6.0 (round 3)

2021-04-06 Thread Tellier Benoit
+1 Le 06/04/2021 à 14:04, Tellier Benoit a écrit : > I would like to propose a new vote 3.6.0 release of the Apache James server. > > After an initial mistake (sorry), a failed vote (could not achieve a PMC > quorum), and more issues I did not yet complain about (closing the maven > artifact

[VOTE] Call for vote: Apache James 3.6.0 (round 3)

2021-04-06 Thread Tellier Benoit
I would like to propose a new vote 3.6.0 release of the Apache James server. After an initial mistake (sorry), a failed vote (could not achieve a PMC quorum), and more issues I did not yet complain about (closing the maven artifact #1051 failed for a missing MD5 signature - network issue?), here