Re: [IMPORTANT] Call for vote: Apache James 3.6.1

2021-12-14 Thread Rémi Kowalski
+1 > Le 14 déc. 2021 à 13:49, btell...@apache.org a écrit : > > +1 > >> On 14/12/2021 19:28, btell...@apache.org wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose a new vote for 3.6.1 release of the Apache James >> server. >> >> You can find: >> >> - The maven release staged in

Re: [VOTE] Call for vote: Apache James 3.6.0 (round 3)

2021-04-06 Thread Rémi Kowalski
+1 Le mar. 6 avr. 2021 à 09:04, Tellier Benoit a écrit : > I would like to propose a new vote 3.6.0 release of the Apache James > server. > > After an initial mistake (sorry), a failed vote (could not achieve a PMC > quorum), and more issues I did not yet complain about (closing the maven >

Re: Call for vote: Apache James 3.5.0

2020-06-19 Thread Rémi Kowalski
+1 Le ven. 19 juin 2020 à 09:43, Rene Cordier a écrit : > +1 > > Rene. > > On 19/06/2020 10:44, Tellier Benoit wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose the 3.5.0 release of the Apache James server. > > > > Here are the changes since the previous proposal: > > > > ``` > > JAMES-3197

Re: Call for vote: Apache James 3.5.0

2020-04-06 Thread Rémi Kowalski
+1 Le lun. 6 avr. 2020 à 13:07, Tellier Benoit a écrit : > Hi, > > I would like to propose the 3.5.0 release of the Apache James server. > > You can see changes proposed to the website at the occasion > of that release on this GitHub pull > request:

Re: Mail to Multiple Recipients on Same Domain Being Discarded

2020-01-24 Thread Rémi Kowalski
very mailet which should > loop on the recipients storing in different mailboxes? > > On 1/23/2020 8:29 AM, Rémi Kowalski wrote: > > Hi Jerry, > > > > We have just added a test in James to check if we can reproduce the > > behavior you reported. > > You c

Re: Mail to Multiple Recipients on Same Domain Being Discarded

2020-01-23 Thread Rémi Kowalski
be a problem with one of your mailet. For debuging your mailet pipeline, you can insert a LogMessage ( http://james.apache.org/mailet/standard/mailet-report.html#LogMessage) mailet before and after each mailet. Cheers, Rémi Kowalski Le jeu. 23 janv. 2020 à 05:47, Jerry Malcolm a écrit

Re: Call for vote: Apache James 3.4.0

2019-09-05 Thread Rémi Kowalski
+1 > Le 5 sept. 2019 à 15:51, Matthieu Baechler a écrit : > > Hi, > > I would like to propose the 3.4.0 release of the Apache James server. > > You can see changes proposed to the website at the occasion > of that release, as well as communication on this GitHub pull > request:

Re: Call for vote: Apache James 3.3.0

2019-03-20 Thread Rémi Kowalski
+1 Le mer. 20 mars 2019 à 10:04, Gautier DI FOLCO a écrit : > +1 > > Le 20/03/2019 à 08:27, Duc Tran a écrit : > > Hi, I agree with the release > > > > +1 > > > > Regards, > > Tran Tien Duc > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to propose the 3.3.0 release of the Apache James server. > >> You can see