+1
> Le 14 déc. 2021 à 13:49, btell...@apache.org a écrit :
>
> +1
>
>> On 14/12/2021 19:28, btell...@apache.org wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose a new vote for 3.6.1 release of the Apache James
>> server.
>>
>> You can find:
>>
>> - The maven release staged in
+1
Le mar. 6 avr. 2021 à 09:04, Tellier Benoit a écrit :
> I would like to propose a new vote 3.6.0 release of the Apache James
> server.
>
> After an initial mistake (sorry), a failed vote (could not achieve a PMC
> quorum), and more issues I did not yet complain about (closing the maven
>
+1
Le ven. 19 juin 2020 à 09:43, Rene Cordier a écrit :
> +1
>
> Rene.
>
> On 19/06/2020 10:44, Tellier Benoit wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose the 3.5.0 release of the Apache James server.
> >
> > Here are the changes since the previous proposal:
> >
> > ```
> > JAMES-3197
+1
Le lun. 6 avr. 2020 à 13:07, Tellier Benoit a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the 3.5.0 release of the Apache James server.
>
> You can see changes proposed to the website at the occasion
> of that release on this GitHub pull
> request:
very mailet which should
> loop on the recipients storing in different mailboxes?
>
> On 1/23/2020 8:29 AM, Rémi Kowalski wrote:
> > Hi Jerry,
> >
> > We have just added a test in James to check if we can reproduce the
> > behavior you reported.
> > You c
be a problem with one of your mailet.
For debuging your mailet pipeline, you can insert a LogMessage (
http://james.apache.org/mailet/standard/mailet-report.html#LogMessage)
mailet before and after each mailet.
Cheers,
Rémi Kowalski
Le jeu. 23 janv. 2020 à 05:47, Jerry Malcolm a
écrit
+1
> Le 5 sept. 2019 à 15:51, Matthieu Baechler a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the 3.4.0 release of the Apache James server.
>
> You can see changes proposed to the website at the occasion
> of that release, as well as communication on this GitHub pull
> request:
+1
Le mer. 20 mars 2019 à 10:04, Gautier DI FOLCO a
écrit :
> +1
>
> Le 20/03/2019 à 08:27, Duc Tran a écrit :
> > Hi, I agree with the release
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tran Tien Duc
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would like to propose the 3.3.0 release of the Apache James server.
> >> You can see