Re: File_Persistent_Stream_Repository question

2003-10-24 Thread Mark Daring
Yep, I totally agree. M - Original Message - From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:00 PM Subject: RE: File_Persistent_Stream_Repository question > Mark, > >

RE: File_Persistent_Stream_Repository question

2003-10-24 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Mark, I believe that you are correct, although it is probably harmless in the code as it would be a re-entrance issue, and we don't permit that for mail messages. The only changes should be the two you specifically noted. The reason that they would not apply to the Object Repository is that the

File_Persistent_Stream_Repository question

2003-10-24 Thread Mark Daring
Shouldnt this lines in File_Persistent_Stream_Repository "public synchronized InputStream get( final String key ) ... final ArrayList list = new ArrayList(); list.add( o ); list.add( stream ); m_inputs.put( key, stream ); ... } " look like this "public sync