Re: Hupa evo status ?

2012-09-12 Thread Manuel Carrasco MoƱino
Hi Zsombor Although hupa-evo introduces several changes to hupa, I have applied recent changes in hupa (most of them submitted by to hupa-evo as well, in order to facilitate the merging when evo was ready. Dont hesitate to submit those changes via JIRA if you already have worked on them, I will

Re: Hupa evo status ?

2012-09-12 Thread Echo
Hi there, I've uploaded the r106 of Hupa Evo to Google for the GSoC sample code. Since I was hunting for the job, so that Hupa Evo has been updated a little slowly. While I think it will be improved after everything is getting stable. Thanks for your tolerance and any advice will be welcome. On

Re: Hupa evo status ?

2012-09-11 Thread gzsombor
Hi, nbsp;Yes, I saw that lot's of changes happened in Hupa Evo, and I can understand, that some of them is incomplete / experimental / etc. nbsp;But it would be better if the finished features were nbsp;added to the main Hupa codebase, and gradually evolve it :) Because I'm eagerly wait for

Re: Hupa evo status ?

2012-09-11 Thread Echo
Hi nbsp;Yes, I saw that lot's of changes happened in Hupa Evo, and I can understand, that some of them is incomplete / experimental / etc. nbsp;But it would be better if the finished features were nbsp;added to the main Hupa codebase, and gradually evolve it :) Because I'm eagerly wait for

Hupa evo status ?

2012-09-06 Thread gzsombor
Hi, nbsp;I see that lot's of changes going on Hupa-evo, but nothing in hupa. I have a couple of fixes, and have another round ofnbsp;enhancementsnbsp;which I miss. But I fear, if I implement the changes, everything become obsolete, when the 2 codebase merged. What's the status of hupa-evo?

Re: Hupa evo status ?

2012-09-06 Thread Echo
Hi Zsombor, From the big aspects, Hupa Evo has introduced some new stuff to replace the old ones, activities and places - gwt-presenter; RequestFactory - gwt-dispatch; LayoutPanel, CellTable, CellTree, a few UiBinder-s - UI. However, at the same time, there has been something lost or should be