Re: JAMES v Java 6

2007-06-01 Thread Kevin Jackson
> Right. > Also the SSL support does not work with Java6. Having tried the -version:1.5.0_11 trick suggested to get the SSL working on Java6 today, some things to note. - Current james server (SVN_TRUNK) doesn't work with jdk6/java6 (same couldn't generate secret problem as before) - using the

Re: JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-29 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On 5/27/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: robert burrell donkin ha scritto: > tagging is unnecessary with subversion. subversion uses universal > version numbers and every commit is atomic. all that's needed is a > document recording incompatible changes (using stefano's definition).

Re: JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-27 Thread Stefano Bagnara
robert burrell donkin ha scritto: > tagging is unnecessary with subversion. subversion uses universal > version numbers and every commit is atomic. all that's needed is a > document recording incompatible changes (using stefano's definition). IMHO the tag is the simpler way to document this ;-) Bt

Re: JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-27 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 5/25/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: > Stefano Bagnara wrote: > >> I'm +1 to remove mordred at all in trunk (after tagging because before >> this change trunk is backward compatible to 2.3.1, instead after this >> change we are no more 100% compatible

Re: JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-25 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: > Stefano Bagnara wrote: > >> I'm +1 to remove mordred at all in trunk (after tagging because before >> this change trunk is backward compatible to 2.3.1, instead after this >> change we are no more 100% compatible). > > How do you figure? Trunk is not compatible with

RE: JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-25 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stefano Bagnara wrote: > I'm +1 to remove mordred at all in trunk (after tagging because before > this change trunk is backward compatible to 2.3.1, instead after this > change we are no more 100% compatible). How do you figure? Trunk is not compatible with 2.3.x due to the changes in the deplo

RE: JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-25 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Jukka Zitting wrote: > Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please note that JAMES will not build with Java 6 unless Mordred > > is removed or updated. Incompatible changes in JDBC. > I checked that and the problem is > org.apache.james.util.mordred.PoolConnEntry class that implements

Re: JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-25 Thread Norman Maurer
Stefano Bagnara schrieb: Jukka Zitting ha scritto: Hi, On 5/24/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please note that JAMES will not build with Java 6 unless Mordred is removed or updated. Incompatible changes in JDBC. I checked that and the problem is org.apache.jame

Re: JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-25 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Jukka Zitting ha scritto: > Hi, > > On 5/24/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Please note that JAMES will not build with Java 6 unless Mordred is >> removed >> or updated. Incompatible changes in JDBC. > > I checked that and the problem is > org.apache.james.util.mordred.PoolConn

Re: JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-25 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On 5/24/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please note that JAMES will not build with Java 6 unless Mordred is removed or updated. Incompatible changes in JDBC. I checked that and the problem is org.apache.james.util.mordred.PoolConnEntry class that implements java.sql.Connect

Re: JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-25 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Kevin Jackson ha scritto: >> Right. >> Also the SSL support does not work with Java6. > > Has anyone found out what's causing this problem? I recall it was > something to do with the available algorithms and some internal change > from Java5 -> Java6. I think no one looked at it more deeply. It i

Re: JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-24 Thread Kevin Jackson
Right. Also the SSL support does not work with Java6. Has anyone found out what's causing this problem? I recall it was something to do with the available algorithms and some internal change from Java5 -> Java6. It's not great having 2 vms on our server (Java5 for james, and Java6 for tomcat)

Re: JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-24 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto: > Please note that JAMES will not build with Java 6 unless Mordred is removed > or updated. Incompatible changes in JDBC. > > --- Noel Right. Also the SSL support does not work with Java6. Stefano --

Re: JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-24 Thread Norman Maurer
Thx for the info :-) bye Norman Noel J. Bergman schrieb: > Please note that JAMES will not build with Java 6 unless Mordred is removed > or updated. Incompatible changes in JDBC. > > --- Noel > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e

JAMES v Java 6

2007-05-24 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Please note that JAMES will not build with Java 6 unless Mordred is removed or updated. Incompatible changes in JDBC. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT