Hello dear James committers,
In the absence of further feedback I will proceed with sanitizing the
[1] proof of concept, to turn it into a full removal of Camel.
Cheers,
Benoit
On 24/05/2021 11:50, Rene Cordier wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> Thanks for raising this concern it's rather interesting,
Hi Benoit,
Thanks for raising this concern it's rather interesting, despite my
limited knowledge on Camel processing and MailetContainer execution.
I think if we can come up with a robust Java implementation allowing to
discard yet an other dependency (Camel) from James, that would be a win
Hello folks,
I want to raise this concern to the mailing list.
As described in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/JAMES/issues/JAMES-3589
One of my customer reported me that a side effect was done two time upon
MailetContainer execution.
When writing integration tests counting executions,
