Actually, I made several changes to Chris Mean's submission, and I think that my
version is right now quite different from Danny's.
The changes were:
1) Chris' submission was implementing Paul Grahams' "A Plan for Spam"
(http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html). I upgraded to Paul Grahams' "Better
> RFC 822 did not have bad examples. As RFC 2822 Section 3.4 makes
> perfectly
> clear, this is an area where RFC (2)821 and RFC (2)822 differ.
Ah! well spotted, reading the RFC's is never much fun, but always worthwhile
:-)
-
Correctly my previous mis-statement regarding:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RFC 822 did not have bad examples. As RFC 2822 Section 3.4 makes perfectly
clear, this is an area where RFC (2)821 and RFC (2)822 differ. I have
modified MailImpl to account for this in the MailImpl
