Hi Shrumit,
Sorry to give you feedback so late.
You proposal is really excellent. I wouldn't have made "testing" a
separated activity (because, you know, TDD, etc) but that looks good and
I don't think it needs much details.
Keep in mind that the deadline for final Proposal is today, 4 PM UT
Agreed,
Lets get you guys moving first, and worry about what comes next next.
So to speak!
d.
On 22/07/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was no audience. It was just Danny and I chatting.
-
To unsubscribe,
There was no audience. It was just Danny and I chatting. We're just really
keen to see you and Anagha able to get on with the work, and feel that it is
better for you guys to get going and then we can give feedback on what you
deliver, than to hold you up.
--- Noel
Noel, Danny:
What was the general mood of the audience when you guys were
discussing the Summer of Code projects? Did anybody have any extra
comments about the projects that Anagha and myself should
consider/handle?
Thanks
On 7/22/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Danny wrote:
>
On 7/22/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Danny wrote:
>
> > I would like to commend *all* of our several SoC applicants
>
> Agreed. They were all great.
>
> > Each of the students has now posted a message about their proposal
> > to this list.
>
> I looked over each, and Danny
On 22/07/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Danny and I talked about them at ApacheCon. We
> agree...
+1 :-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Danny wrote:
> I would like to commend *all* of our several SoC applicants
Agreed. They were all great.
> Each of the students has now posted a message about their proposal
> to this list.
I looked over each, and Danny and I talked about them at ApacheCon. We
agree that both students should g
Just as an FYI to people, I posted my design as an addition to the
thread "Proposal for Web Admin Console" on this mailing list.
On 7/12/05, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm pleased to say, as I'm sure you've all realised, that we have two
> students who's proposals have been
Hi,
I did a little more work on the design and fixed some
mistakes. Attached is an updated design.
awaiting comments ...
-- anagha
--- Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm pleased to say, as I'm sure you've all realised,
> that we have two
> students who's proposals have been ac
comme je te disais les mailing listes ont beaucoup d'usage notament
d'offrir du support au projet open-source (donc gratuit).
Prenons l'exemple de la mailing list du projet James (c'est un serveur
de mail).
Le principe d'une mailinglist est simple. Si quelqu'un se pose une
question, il envoie
hat's just my vision. Encourage others to contribute. We are
consensus driven at the ASF.
--- Noel
-Original Message-
From: Anne S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 11:54
To: James Developers List
Subject: Re: Google Summer Of Code - Interfaces
That wo
That would be terrific. If I understand this correctly, you are
proposing a documentation and conceptual model (less programming, more
diagramming) project, correct?
I would definitely be open to that, if you believe it to be a better
use of time. I'll draw up a revised application to reflect this
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|
| cc:
Anne,
Anything you do specifically with config.xml and user repositories today may
not work in future versions of JAMES, since we want to move to a more
flexibile idea of configuration.
Alternatively, you might create a model of what JAMES configuration should
be, and then look at how to map betw
> Regarding the config.xml, would people be OK with a two parter:
> -Server side Java wrapper around config.xml. An API would be
> exposed so other programs, not just mine, could manipulate config.xml.
> -A Java Servlet based interface that connects to the wrapper
> and manipulates config.xml
Ja
>
> Another question: Are people happier with JSP or Java Servlets? Yes,
> in the end, they compile out to the same thing, but sometimes I hear
> quasi-religious wars on which deployment solution is the best ;-)
Both!
Niether are particularly good at producing a sensible system.
JSPs are great f
Blast, I never thought about a racked situation. Thanks.
Regarding the config.xml, would people be OK with a two parter:
-Server side Java wrapper around config.xml. An API would be exposed
so other programs, not just mine, could manipulate config.xml.
-A Java Servlet based interface that connects
Hi Ben.
As I'm the sucker trying to get IMAP to work I will attempt to fill you in.
If you've checked out the code form SVN you'll need to look at the IMAP2
proposal as this is the one I'm working from. It has a complete protocol
stack but lacks the ability to persist messages to disk for db (it c
Hi Ben.
As I'm the sucker trying to get IMAP to work I will attempt to fill you in.
If you've checked out the code form SVN you'll need to look at the IMAP2
proposal as this is the one I'm working from. It has a complete protocol
stack but lacks the ability to persist messages to disk for db (it c
19 matches
Mail list logo
