Robert Burrell Donkin írta:
1. i know that quite a lot of the IMAP/mailbox stuff is junk (both
mine code and the old stuff). IMAP/mailbox is most of trunk. so yes, a
substantial quantity of code in trunk is junk. a more important issue
is that it's difficult to gain consensus on the production
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Hontvari Jozsef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin írta:
1. i know that quite a lot of the IMAP/mailbox stuff is junk (both
mine code and the old stuff). IMAP/mailbox is most of trunk. so yes, a
substantial quantity of code in trunk is junk.
Hontvari Jozsef wrote:
The trunk receives all changes. It must always be in a useable state.
Trying convincing people of that. :-) Robert, for example, explicitly
considers that to be the wrong approach, and indicates that he considers a
substantial amount of trunk to be junk. His thought is
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Hontvari Jozsef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering the low frequency of releases and the small number of new
features,
there are plenty of new features on trunk
- robert
-
To unsubscribe,
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hontvari Jozsef wrote:
The trunk receives all changes. It must always be in a useable state.
Trying convincing people of that. :-) Robert, for example, explicitly
considers that to be the wrong approach, and
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Hontvari Jozsef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Moreover James is a mature product, nobody is forced to upgrade.
I am using the same custom version for about 3 years if not more.
If there are enough features or a few months elapsed, release a beta
version
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
Hontvari Jozsef wrote:
The trunk receives all changes. It must always be in a useable state.
Trying convincing people of that. :-) Robert, for example, explicitly
considers that to be the wrong approach, and indicates that he considers a
substantial amount of
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
Hontvari Jozsef wrote:
The trunk receives all changes. It must always be in a useable state.
Trying convincing people of that. :-) Robert, for example, explicitly
considers that to be the wrong approach, and indicates that he
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
Hontvari Jozsef wrote:
The trunk receives all changes. It must always be in a useable state.
Trying convincing people of that. :-) Robert, for example, explicitly
considers
Am Mittwoch, den 16.04.2008, 14:40 +0100 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Noel J. Bergman ha scritto:
Hontvari Jozsef wrote:
The trunk receives all changes. It must always be in a useable state.
Glad you guys seem to have had some productive chat @apachecon. Sorry
I had to miss it this year, its the easter holidays and I went to
Aviemore with the family. Loads of snow on the ski slopes, which is
unusual for the time of year.
http://www.cairngormmountain.org.uk/web-cam
However to get to
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glad you guys seem to have had some productive chat @apachecon. Sorry
I had to miss it this year, its the easter holidays and I went to
Aviemore with the family. Loads of snow on the ski slopes, which is
unusual for the
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the major issue is that we don't collectively understand the quality
of the code in trunk nor how it differs from 2.4.x
+1 I think, and hope, that that is what Noel, in his inimitable
style, is pushing us
Considering the low frequency of releases and the small number of new
features, the version management structure of James seems to be an
overkill.
(Or maybe I just don't understand the system.)
Although I don't think this is new for anybody here is the simplest
procedure:
The trunk receives
14 matches
Mail list logo
