I talked with noel about this.. I allready did this for jspf and open a
task for james for next release..
bye
Norman
Am Montag, den 17.07.2006, 10:01 +0200 schrieb Bernd Fondermann:
> On 7/16/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 7/16/06, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 7/16/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/16/06, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> maybe - maybe not. regardless how the directories will be structured -
> it should be easy for users to find the file they are searching for.
> it can be hard to spot the right
On 7/16/06, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
maybe - maybe not. regardless how the directories will be structured -
it should be easy for users to find the file they are searching for.
it can be hard to spot the right one from all the tars, zips and
zip-tars, if there are a few differ
maybe - maybe not. regardless how the directories will be structured -
it should be easy for users to find the file they are searching for.
it can be hard to spot the right one from all the tars, zips and
zip-tars, if there are a few different projects in the same directory.
probably we have to c
Hmm no problems with that..
But then we should also seperate the mailetSDK
bye
Norman
Am Sonntag, den 16.07.2006, 22:07 +0200 schrieb Bernd Fondermann:
> can we move dist/james/* to dist/james/server/* to allow for
> dist/james/jspf? we would have at least to fix the link under
> Downloads/Relea
can we move dist/james/* to dist/james/server/* to allow for
dist/james/jspf? we would have at least to fix the link under
Downloads/Releases/Test Builds.
Bernd
On 7/16/06, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the "time" is over now.. So should i move it to
http://people.apache.org
I think the "time" is over now.. So should i move it to
http://people.apache.org/dist/james/ ?
bye
Norman
Am Dienstag, den 11.07.2006, 22:21 +0200 schrieb Norman Maurer:
> Ok build,sign and uploaded again as 0.9b1 ..
> Hope thats ok now..
>
> bye
> Norman
>
> Am Dienstag, den 11.07.2006, 12:5
Ok build,sign and uploaded again as 0.9b1 ..
Hope thats ok now..
bye
Norman
Am Dienstag, den 11.07.2006, 12:55 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman:
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>
> > I thought that 0.x already show a beta status.
>
> There are projects released out there that still haven't gotten to 1.0
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> I thought that 0.x already show a beta status.
There are projects released out there that still haven't gotten to 1.0. ;-)
Even a few within the ASF. I would prefer to be clear to the user what
expectation they should have.
> 0.9b1 ?
Sure, why not.
--- Noel
Am Dienstag, den 11.07.2006, 16:18 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > And thank you for the build.xml. :-)
> >
> > +1 if this is going to be labeled as a beta.
> >
> > --- Noel
>
> I thought that 0.x already show a beta status.
> Btw please tell us the exact version
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
And thank you for the build.xml. :-)
+1 if this is going to be labeled as a beta.
--- Noel
I thought that 0.x already show a beta status.
Btw please tell us the exact versioning you will vote +1 ;-)
0.9b ?
0.9b1 ?
I'm not sure that beta is the best descriptor
And thank you for the build.xml. :-)
+1 if this is going to be labeled as a beta.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1
Vincenzo
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi guys,
i just build,sign and upload the jspf release. I want to get it out
finally. Plz vote..
Source and binary can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~norman/jspf/downloads
Website can be found here:
http://people.apache.org/~norman/jspf/
The Websi
+1 Stefano Bagnara
Imho we need this release so people will start testing it and we can
start integrating jspf support in james trunk.
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi guys,
i just build,sign and upload the jspf release. I want to get it out
finally. Plz vote..
Source and binary can be found here:
h
14 matches
Mail list logo
