Re: Central class for service injection

2006-07-12 Thread Bernd Fondermann
You don't even have 10 minutes?? ;-) Of course, I don't mind if you use it. Bernd Siegfried Goeschl wrote: Hi Bernd, do you mind if I nick the idea for Turbine/Fulcrum ... :-) ... never had the time to write it. Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Bernd Fondermann wrote: Having setters to inje

Re: Central class for service injection

2006-07-12 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi Bernd, do you mind if I nick the idea for Turbine/Fulcrum ... :-) ... never had the time to write it. Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Bernd Fondermann wrote: Having setters to inject service components (Store, DNSServer and all the others) into the respective objects creates a new chance to ta

Re: Central class for service injection

2006-07-12 Thread Bernd Fondermann
Stefano Bagnara wrote: Bernd Fondermann wrote: Having setters to inject service components (Store, DNSServer and all the others) into the respective objects creates a new chance to take another step to dramatically lower the dependency on Avalon and centralize the service lookup code. You'

Re: Central class for service injection

2006-07-12 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Bernd Fondermann wrote: Having setters to inject service components (Store, DNSServer and all the others) into the respective objects creates a new chance to take another step to dramatically lower the dependency on Avalon and centralize the service lookup code. You're almost precisely descri

Re: Central class for service injection

2006-07-12 Thread Norman Maurer
This sound very cool to me and whould give me also a better "extension" solution for my smtp-api-fastfail stuff to make it easier to write fastfail stuff. bye Norman Am Mittwoch, den 12.07.2006, 12:34 +0200 schrieb Bernd Fondermann: > Having setters to inject service components (Store, DNSServer