Re: Logging Framework for James/Spring

2007-09-10 Thread Serge Knystautas
On 9/10/07, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [] commons-logging > [ +1 ] log4j > [] java.util.logging > [] plain file write (poor man's own framework) > [] slf4j > [] ... other ... I don't see the need to use a wrapping log library and think log4j is rather widely used. I'm reasonabl

Re: Logging Framework for James/Spring

2007-09-10 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: > Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> To summarize, currently here is my ordered list of preferences: >> 1) JUL with a single rotating file configuration >> 2) log4j > > I'd reverse the list, simply due to bad press jul received recently (I > don't know it) and because I worked

Re: Logging Framework for James/Spring

2007-09-10 Thread Bernd Fondermann
Stefano Bagnara wrote: Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: Hi, We need a proper Logging Framework integrated with the spring-deployment module. Currently, all logging is going to System.out. I'd like to have at least log messages to go to a single file 'james.log' but also support the possibilty for

Re: Logging Framework for James/Spring

2007-09-10 Thread Bernd Fondermann
Stefano Bagnara wrote: Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: While commons-logging seems a good choice at first sight, after thinking about it for a while, I now think we should go for the second option. I'm not sure I understand: our code already directly depends on both Avalon-Framework-Loggers and C

Re: Logging Framework for James/Spring

2007-09-10 Thread Norman Maurer
Stefano Bagnara schrieb: Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: Hi, We need a proper Logging Framework integrated with the spring-deployment module. Currently, all logging is going to System.out. I'd like to have at least log messages to go to a single file 'james.log' but also support the possibilty

Re: Logging Framework for James/Spring

2007-09-10 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: > While commons-logging seems a good choice at first sight, after > thinking about it for a while, I now think we should go for the second > option. I'm not sure I understand: our code already directly depends on both Avalon-Framework-Loggers and Common-Logging-Logger.

Re: Logging Framework for James/Spring

2007-09-10 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On 9/10/07, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bernd Fondermann schrieb: > > What I am asking is: What framework should be the default? > > > I think I would use commons-logging... > > bye > Norman I'd like to describe the different levels of indirection which are present in James/Spring t

Re: Logging Framework for James/Spring

2007-09-10 Thread Stefano Bagnara
Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: > Hi, > > We need a proper Logging Framework integrated with the spring-deployment > module. > > Currently, all logging is going to System.out. > I'd like to have at least log messages to go to a single file > 'james.log' but also support the possibilty for current ph

Re: Logging Framework for James/Spring

2007-09-10 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On 9/10/07, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > What I am asking is: What framework should be the default? > > Here is a list: > [] commons-logging > [] log4j > [] java.util.logging > [] plain file write (poor man's own framework) > [] slf4j > [] ... other ... I forgot one obviou

Re: Logging Framework for James/Spring

2007-09-10 Thread Norman Maurer
Bernd Fondermann schrieb: Hi, We need a proper Logging Framework integrated with the spring-deployment module. Currently, all logging is going to System.out. I'd like to have at least log messages to go to a single file 'james.log' but also support the possibilty for current phoenix-like be