Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Possible solutions I can think of are...
o go on patching JAMES-442, don't change anything right now
+0
o move to a svn-sandbox, allow for more review, feedback and tests
+0.5
o make it a subproject
+1
o merge into James Server codebase (option: hold on until mv
Im fully agree. Making this a subproject whould make the most sense to
me. And yes you are right for create a subproject we must vote.
bye
Norman
Am Freitag, den 26.05.2006, 16:49 +0200 schrieb Bernd Fondermann:
> Hi,
>
> Over the last weeks I have tested different JAMES versions and
> configur
