Re: Repositories refactoring proposal

2005-08-23 Thread Stefano Bagnara
> > IMHO James needs to have people doing things to it, we've had a > > virtual > > -1 > > I know I'm going to step on toes by saying this but... > > James does not need more code before James needs management > and design. > > Everyone, except for Stefano, seems to be too busy. Which is >

Re: Repositories refactoring proposal

2005-08-23 Thread Danny Angus
On 23/08/05, Kervin L. Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know I'm going to step on toes by saying this > but... > > James does not need more code before James needs > management and design. I don't think you are being overly critical, but I do think you are oversimplifying the situation. Jam

Re: Repositories refactoring proposal

2005-08-23 Thread Kervin L. Pierre
Danny Angus wrote: On 8/22/05, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMHO the ONLY way to move is to CODE something +1 IMHO James needs to have people doing things to it, we've had a virtual -1 I know I'm going to step on toes by saying this but... James does not need more code bef

Re: Repositories refactoring proposal

2005-08-23 Thread Danny Angus
On 8/22/05, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMHO the ONLY way to move is to CODE something +1 IMHO James needs to have people doing things to it, we've had a virtual moratorium on changes this last while and I see our current position as being one in which we can afford to, in fact y

Re: Repositories refactoring proposal

2005-08-22 Thread Serge Knystautas
On 8/22/05, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMHO the ONLY way to move is to CODE something +1 -- Serge Knystautas Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com p. 301.656.5501 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: Repositories refactoring proposal

2005-08-22 Thread Ahmed Mohombe
7) IMAP: create This sounds like the most appealing :). Ahmed. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]