robert burrell donkin wrote:
JAMES is a complex, mature application but now contains many youthful
components. perhaps these new components would benefit from a quicker
release cycle than the main application.
perhaps it might be worth considering decoupling the spring support
from the normal ja
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
For the next release I would like to
+ have basic (whatever than means) IMAP stable, perfoming and
functional, and well integrated with the rest of James architecture.
+ have more online management and monitoring features done
+ have a Spring distribution besides the other
On 12/16/06, Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> + have a Spring distribution besides the other packages
>>
>
> Let's do it! :-)
>
>
If im not wrong then there is allready a sandbox on which joachim is workin.
JAMES is a complex, mature application but now contains many youthful
components
Hi guys,
Joachim Draeger schrieb:
> Hi Bernd,
>
> Am Samstag, den 16.12.2006, 08:50 +0100 schrieb Bernd Fondermann:
>
>
>>> its now about 4 weeks ago when Stefano and me posted a roadmap proposal
>>> to the mailling list. Nothing concrete happen since this posting. I
>>> really whould like to
Hi Bernd,
Am Samstag, den 16.12.2006, 08:50 +0100 schrieb Bernd Fondermann:
> > its now about 4 weeks ago when Stefano and me posted a roadmap proposal
> > to the mailling list. Nothing concrete happen since this posting. I
> > really whould like to get this odd roadmap stuff done now to focus o
Hi,
On 12/14/06, Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi commiters,
its now about 4 weeks ago when Stefano and me posted a roadmap proposal
to the mailling list. Nothing concrete happen since this posting. I
really whould like to get this odd roadmap stuff done now to focus on
working on the next
