Re: svn question: Downloading the old stuff

2009-05-26 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:43 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote: >> >> the 3.x stuff is spread out into a number of different locations and >> that'll only check out IMAP and server >> >> unless anyone jumps in with an

Re: svn question: Downloading the old stuff

2009-05-25 Thread Eric MacAdie
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote: the 3.x stuff is spread out into a number of different locations and that'll only check out IMAP and server unless anyone jumps in with an objection, i'll delete that and create a http://svn.apache.org/repos/

Re: svn question: Downloading the old stuff

2009-05-25 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> >> once i explain some background, it might make a little more sense to >> you... >> >> apache james is a project: a self-organising community with a single >> set of committers developing the source and a singl

Re: svn question: Downloading the old stuff

2009-05-24 Thread Eric MacAdie
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: once i explain some background, it might make a little more sense to you... apache james is a project: a self-organising community with a single set of committers developing the source and a single PMC with votes that bind apache. apache james server is the flagship

Re: svn question: Downloading the old stuff

2009-05-23 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Eric MacAdie wrote: > I am looked a bit at the 407 page  svn red book > (http://svnbook.red-bean.com/), and I might find an answer to this question > there, but I will ask here anyway. Can I exclude certain parts of the souce > directory tree from a checkout? i'm